Would you fuck a bottom who has AIDS? (with a condom and he takes antiretrovirals, so he's undetectable, also he's a 10/10)

>>40116410 (OP)
if someone has been taking antiretrovirals long enough to be undetectable it would even be safe to go raw (their choice or smth idc)

so yeah why not

Yes rapestick and everything

>>40116410 (OP)
i'm not fucking a bottom period (i don't even have a cock to do it with) but i guess so

Officially it's "safer" because "he knows his status" but it still gives me the ick, sorry. Yes I know that's just incentivizing people to not disclose but still. Sorry.

>>40116410 (OP)
Yeah no shit, theres literally no chance of me catching anything and hes a 10/10

>>40116455
>>40117020
there's a chance he's lying

>>40117069
then why would they even mention it

the chances of catching aids is probably lower than from someone who says they have no stds

>>40117069
That's not how the hypothetical is presented, "is undetectable" not "says he is undetectable"

absolutely never

>>40116410 (OP)
you can't get HIV from topping so it's fine

>>40117997
truth nuke. If you have AIDS you are a bottom

>>40116410 (OP)
>Would you fuck a bottom
no