Anonymous
6/21/2025, 8:40:13 AM No.40125672
There is literally no point to allow this to exist as a political movement beyond larping as a bourgeois nationalist movement at a point where they are basically no longer necessary. It is a bourgeois nationalist movement for a minority of society's interests over the majority. Bolsheviks = majoritarian, Menshiviks = minoritarian. It is a bourgeois nationalist movement for the unipolar liberal-universalists. The LGBT movement has only ever produced reactionary politics. China most certainly doesn't need it, you can get whatever hormones you need fine there and you can enter relations freely with any consenting adult of any sex. Any establishment of an LGBT movement there at that point is fundamentally to the right of and outside of the control of a Communist political hegemony. Nowhere in history has a meaningful Communist movement, which will always necessarily be a majoritarian movement, based itself around sexual or gender minorities. If you advocate for the LGBT movement in 2025, you are conceding to an objective form of reaction.
Queer Theory is fundamentally a theory of endless transgression against everything and will never the basis of anything that actually establishes political hegemony or statecraft beyond the accomplishments of Joe Biden. That is the practical height of Queer Theory.
And honestly, what has the LGBT movement produced for America? Momentary EXCESSIVE rights to irl-janny society for short political cycles that then swing back to deprivations that in some cases result in EXTREME losses in quality of life. This instability itself has produced worse outcomes for the actual people who get lumped under this umbrella alphabet than if it were to never exist.
Queer Theory is fundamentally a theory of endless transgression against everything and will never the basis of anything that actually establishes political hegemony or statecraft beyond the accomplishments of Joe Biden. That is the practical height of Queer Theory.
And honestly, what has the LGBT movement produced for America? Momentary EXCESSIVE rights to irl-janny society for short political cycles that then swing back to deprivations that in some cases result in EXTREME losses in quality of life. This instability itself has produced worse outcomes for the actual people who get lumped under this umbrella alphabet than if it were to never exist.
Replies: