>>40150471 (OP)>Why is srs so controversial?big disinformation campaign started by a handful of girlcock fetishists that got out of hand and started infecting normies, especially conservatives who never do any of their own research and parrot the first viable sounding factoid thrown their way
so now us trannies with debilitating genital dysphoria have to suffer cis guys telling us what our dysphoria really is and how we should treat it
lemme tackle some of the most common chud disinformation points here:
>rotting flesh pocketnever was, even the most primitive surgeries made sanitary, functional vaginas for the most part, its only gotten better now through innovations of surgeons like suporn
>hair insidethey use many techniques to ensure that there is no hair in the canal. some may regrow but thats easily fixed. can also do electro beforehand to eliminate hair entirely
>smellentirely a personal hygiene issue. colon grafts (rare) might have a fecal smell initially because of the transferred bacterial flora but that's quickly dealt with through cleaning
>constantly tries to seal itself shut>have to dilate foreverthe muscles around the canal simply get tighter without use instead of any tissue fusing shut
past a certain point in healing you can replace dilation with PIV sex or masturbation, and the touted "once a week forever" frequency is more or less fake
cis women also suffer from a similar condition called vaginismus, and they're actually the primary patients for vaginal dilators, not srs patients
>you can always tellpeople only claim they can tell because they're shown pictures with pre-existing knowledge that this is a neovagina, especially with world-class doctors the aesthetic result is indistinguishable even with a thorough examination by a gynecologist let alone in the heat of passion in a dim room by a regular guy
>lack of sensation, doesnt feel like a vaginavast majority of patients report retaining genital sensation and orgasmic function