Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:23:12 PM No.40208865
Nietzsche was right. After everyone else transitions and become ubermensch women, the repper will be the last man
Replies:
Thread 40208865 - /lgbt/ [Archived: 707 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 6:43:04 PM No.40209510
>>40208865 (OP)
you don't get it. overman/underman is not the same as first man/last man. sometimes last man and underman are the same, sometimes they aren't. nietzsche is referring to himself when he talks about last men (the type from whom ascetics emerge) and undermen (the type from who dostoyevskian artists emerge)
you don't get it. overman/underman is not the same as first man/last man. sometimes last man and underman are the same, sometimes they aren't. nietzsche is referring to himself when he talks about last men (the type from whom ascetics emerge) and undermen (the type from who dostoyevskian artists emerge)
Replies:
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 6:44:05 PM No.40209518
>>40209510
*dostyevsky when he talks about undermen
*dostyevsky when he talks about undermen
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 7:00:18 PM No.40209634
>>40209510
>nietzsche is referring to himself when he talks about last men
I'm referring to myself as the last man (the final form of the repper)
>nietzsche is referring to himself when he talks about last men
I'm referring to myself as the last man (the final form of the repper)
Replies:
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 7:01:24 PM No.40209643
>>40209634
my autism took over, and i didn't get. my apologies
my autism took over, and i didn't get. my apologies
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 7:05:55 PM No.40209676
>>40209510
Nietzsche isn’t worth aggrandizing. He is only human, all too human.
Nietzsche isn’t worth aggrandizing. He is only human, all too human.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 7:12:37 PM No.40209728
>>40209676
i agree. take st. paul. when i first read BG&E (i think that's where this is) i took his whole discussion of paul as a value judgement. specifically, the passage "i have no words for something so tremendous" passage, when he's talking about how paul almost single-handedly destroyed the ideological bedrock of rome, i saw as a condemnation. but in the context of how nietzsche talks about himself, as a destroyer, an under-goer, someone who "philosophizes with a hammer": it's clear to me now that nietzsche saw a lot of himself in the "dysangelist"
i agree. take st. paul. when i first read BG&E (i think that's where this is) i took his whole discussion of paul as a value judgement. specifically, the passage "i have no words for something so tremendous" passage, when he's talking about how paul almost single-handedly destroyed the ideological bedrock of rome, i saw as a condemnation. but in the context of how nietzsche talks about himself, as a destroyer, an under-goer, someone who "philosophizes with a hammer": it's clear to me now that nietzsche saw a lot of himself in the "dysangelist"
Replies:
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 7:20:07 PM No.40209786
Replies:
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 7:38:14 PM No.40209966
Replies:
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 9:30:28 PM No.40211064
>>40209728
I mean maybe but Nietzsche also said philosophers are inherently autistic loser who are as good at courting truth as they are courting women. Part of his philosophy is to accept truth as relative so part of his writing style is almost certainly done to generate relative and differing perspectives. What he truly intends in his writings are beside the point as you will only glean your own perspective from his work. Which is as he intends.
>>40209966
Wrong!
Trannies are the uberwench
I mean maybe but Nietzsche also said philosophers are inherently autistic loser who are as good at courting truth as they are courting women. Part of his philosophy is to accept truth as relative so part of his writing style is almost certainly done to generate relative and differing perspectives. What he truly intends in his writings are beside the point as you will only glean your own perspective from his work. Which is as he intends.
>>40209966
Wrong!
Trannies are the uberwench