>>40346027Maybe I wouldn't because that's the good old way of looking at this. That's famously what the romans thought about this but it's not just the romans.
It's unironically kind of true. Gender isn't black and white, therefore attraction isn't black and white and defining sexual orientation via attraction to femininity or masculinity is actually way more coherent than defining it via chromosomes or some bull like that. And twinks are quite effeminate, that's in the definition of a twink. It's not very straight for a man to fuck Buck Angel, why wouldn't the reverse be true? Where as from the point of view of the twink it's undoubtedly gay unless he also has a non-typical relationship to his own gender.