Its absolutely what you should be doing. The first instinct you have about someone is 99% of the time the correct one. If you think your initial instinct was wrong, thats just because the version of them they're giving you is doing its job in deceiving you. Your very first thought about someon, remember it.
If someone is creepy, if they have weird pets like spiders or snakes, absolutely its correct to judge them for that sort of stuff.
If people give you the creeps there is a good reason for it.


My motto is, always be judging people, and keep close tabs kn their reactions to certain stimuli.

I would hack 4chan just so I could ban you

>>40393593 (OP)
idk spiders are pretty cool

>>40393593 (OP)
insightful as always transbian, what's your opinion on t4t sisters having vaginal sex?

>>40393593 (OP)
It's really easy to take this the wrong way or judge people unfairly or poorly based on this. Unfortunately, it also happens to be correct for those of us who are reasonably intelligent and capable of reading basic body language and social cues. You can be as kind a person as you want, but if you have an IQ over 130 you probably won't be able to help seeing who deserves it or not. I know if I'm likely to get along with someone after the first few minutes, what ways they'll likely annoy me or be narrow minded/just plain stupid or ignorant. It's an unfortunate truth of our species that although something like race isn't the most relevant factor, someone who even passively pays attention will begin to link likely behavior to specific phenotype (like there are types of white guys who can't think critically and then there are types of hispanics who can only do some types of spatial reasoning but not others, etc).

Basically, a genetically/epigenetically well-rounded individual is always going to be rare, you might not be able to guess what most people will do down to a science, but it gets to a point where you intrinsically do understand what most people's potential likely is.

Those of us who are aware of this often bear the knowledge with reluctance, it's very lonely to recognize one's own superiority.

>>40394478
>blah blah blah genetics
>I am superior
???

>>40394478
Intelligent people often tell you to follow some type of rule, or that another one is pointless, but forget that you need to first be intelligent for this to apply. This is likely the cause for much of the shit we're in.

>>40394626
Right, bigotry is caused by people oversimplifying stuff like this, and even people who are good at this can be surprised.
>>40394513
You didn't understand it then? Just a note, by superior I mostly just mean more capable/intelligent/symmetrical. I don't mean some kind of ontological value, it's not like any human has some kind of set worth. And you might enjoy the company of a stupid ugly neanderthal more than say, Mozart, to each their own.

That's not true. It's better to get to know people and try to understand what their whole life system is like. Only then will you be able to truly know a person.

>>40394687
>Wastes life trying to see the "spark" on obvious losers and boring romantic partners. I wonder how many intelligent people's lives were wasted because of this type of ridiculous moralizing.

>>40394711
Why are you so negative? Bad experiences?

>>40394718
Just experiences, I get along with most people irl, I also tend to hate them in equal measure. I think I can count the people on one hand that I'm sure don't deserve to be executed and that doesn't even get into whether or not they're particularly interesting or bright.

>>40394736
Aren't you the one wasting life then, having such strong opinions about people you don't even deem worthy of your attention?

>>40394408
Not OP but fucking trans guys is literally heavenly

>>40394743
No, I mean it does waste time to have to make those decisions, but that's just life. The people I associate with are people I like or find useful, that doesn't make them remotely good or especially important to me though. I treat people fairly but stop interacting when I want to, just like anyone else should without the lying to myself.

>>40394761
You are only creating more work for yourself by being judgemental instead of being chill.

>>40394784
I'm being chill, this is my space to say what I really think, what do you think would be more work? Pretending people are good or intrinsically noble in some way sounds like it'd lead to some delusional beliefs and unrealistic expectations desu.

>>40394829
You are wasting time making up strawmen to defend your point of view against rn. My preliminary judgement is that you are dunning-kruger.

>>40393593 (OP)
Lmao this is why women are so bad at choosing partners

>>40394687
Sounds like an opinion that will result in a divorce.

>>40394899
I didn't create a strawman or any kind of man for that matter, it's not like I'm saying anything that's not true, although some of it's subjective. I'm on here, posting on 4chan at the moment regardless, so it's only a waste of time insomuch as the whole site is.

>>40394899
>My preliminary judgement is that you are dunning-kruger.

I also judge that anon to be dunning cruger, and on top of it i judge they are suffering from a severe superiority complex. Its not to say i dont find them entertaining, but more so i find them sad.

>>40394905
Not me. I can judge people. If i had a JOJO stand itd be something to do with decoding the truth in peoples statements. NOTHING slips by me.

very popular opinion, i think what people miss is how crystallized they get in their own precepts of morality in spite of change, and miss the essence of what makes people people.
it's a good strategy for also living superficially