Like literally look at their hands, feet or shoulders - they're too fucking small, cartoonishly small, dysgenic. And that's in proportions to their bodies, I'm not talking about absolute size. But, yeah, they're hella short in general. They can have nice hips and ass, but it doesn't matter when their shoulders are fucked up slops. There is no beauty, no grace.
I can understand when people like athletic tall women or models with strong features, but most women look like short blobs of fat.

why does any animal develop extreme features? to attract mates.

>>40408466 (OP)
Because we are cursed.

They are baby factories.

>>40408466 (OP)
nature had to make many compromises to get that freakishly large human head out of those hips

humans are literally at the limit of viability, our birth mortality rate is massive compared to chimps and other monkeys

>>40408503
But how can they be blind to this ugliness?
The worst is when it's two lesbians with short hair and you just can see all their bones. That's hideous. No wonder women need makeup and pretty clothes to look respectable.

>>40408699
i'm autistic but all humans just look like monkeys to me

>>40408719
Aahahah I wish I could see the world through your eyes

>>40408719
yeah ur adorably autistic :3

>>40408699
strangely men find these features attractive.
you even said yourself you find wide hips attractive.

>>40408466 (OP)
Women's body's are beautiful and soft, I hate my own but I still think men are nowhere near as beautiful as women.

I'd kill for a nice afab body desu. men only have beautiful bodies when they maintain them

>>40408466 (OP)
>>40408699
you're ftm, correct? cishons and cispooners exist. i see them, every day. ask yourself what beauty standards are really at play here: tall, strong shoulders, thin, "tan" (the "tanness" is especially revealing: who does that refer to, normally?). people who are "universally attractive" are really just attractive to the ruling class of white capitalists

the tanning thing really is perverse. at least when hereditary rule prevailed in europe europeans made lazy, white fatness fashionable, which is sensible. that the white bourgeoisie have made it fashionable amongst themselves to look like their ancestors' serfs is a testament to their utter spiritual debasement

>>40409037
Nice doesn't mean wide and big, and it's ruined by fucked up shoulders 95%

>>40409137
Incorrect and it’s not something being pushed onto me.

>>40409303
it's something being pushed onto all of us
>The worst is when it's two lesbians with short hair and you just can see all their bones
so you're a repping ftm? are you the one with the gf who wants to pretend you're still both cis lesbians? weren't you going on a date tonight?

>>40409137
the bourgeoisie are based. they turned food into art, mastery over your desires a virtue, and the body into material to be sculpted. the working class occupy the uglier side of capitalist ideology; they're hedonistic and self-destructive.

>>40409368
Idk about who you're talking.
And I was like this since forever

>>40409432
>food into art
they've totally raped the culinary arts, as they've done to every other form. they're not even capable of appreciating food
>mastery over your desires into a virtue
said fucking plato. how can you give them credit for this
>the body into material to be sculpted
again, the athenians. perhaps the greeks inherited something of the gymnasium from the east, but these ideas did not come from john maynard keynes or any other bourgeois thinker, i can tell you that

>>40409437
are you amab or afab? if you're amab, congrats, you're gay. if you're afab, you sound like a repping ftm

>>40408466 (OP)
where's that fucked up bdd pooner who keeps posting hsrself?

>an entire half of what is required for human reproduction is "dysgenic"

Is this what happens at the next level of terminal online-ness

Is this what I have to look forward to

>>40408466 (OP)
dainty femrepper hands typed this post
have you ever seen how silly and large our heads are compared to AFAB heads? we have no curves, no boobies, skinny legs

>>40408699
you're trying too hard we all know AFABs are prettier

>>40408466 (OP)
>>40408699
Womens appeal is that they're smaller, softer and curvy. If you see that as "ugliness" you're probably just attracted to men, huge majority of men find it really desirable. Even most of tomboys are shorter and feminine compared to men, at most masculine most of women look like 12 year old boys. Which has its own appeal too but it again goes back to their neoteny and petite body.
So no matter do you like petite, thick or masculine girls it almost always goes back to men desiring them for their feminity. Even if that's a feminity on really androgynous tomboy, it's still a feminity because of their face and soft skin.
So it's still a kind of feminity.
"Short blobs of fat" are pure plap material and most fertile to start families with (not obese or extremely fat of course).
There are extremely masculine and athletic women, and there are men who find that attractive, but those women are rare men development to like smaller women. 6'1 afab for example is not something you see every day, but 5'5 is everywhere.