I'm not gay but I occasionally seethe and get pissed off about how gays do anal and oral rather than intercrural.
It fucking ticks me off so bad. Why the fuck would you prefer getting shit on your dick and damaging a vital orifice of your supposed lover, or having your dick between things used to crush and slice flesh while hearing your supposed lover gag, over the patrician act of coitus interfemoris?
I have a theory that homophobia wouldn't have been as bad historically if it wasn't for anal and oral, genuinely. I think that a big portion of the hatred of gays comes from these two acts, and that hatred wouldn't be there or at least not as strong if you fucked each others' thighs instead of that gross shit.

>>40421485 (OP)
>I think that a big portion of the hatred of gays comes from these two acts
You’re wrong, straight men love fucking women in their mouth and ass. It’s the male part that bothers them especially if the bottom isn’t feminine.

>>40421507
I'm straight and that shit's fucking gross. Show examples from the era where homosexuality was taboo of men being big on blowjobs and anal.
Straight men only considered fucking women in the ass when homosexuality started to become accepted.

>>40421507
>>40421514
ALSO, straight men would only do that shit to women they don't love. If a straight man loves a woman, he isn't going to fuck her in the ass unless something is wrong with him.