“Never forget: women can't know for sure they're women unless they've had their chromosomes checked, but if a man says he's a woman he's definitely a woman and it is highly offensive to mention his chromosomes, which are entirely irrelevant to whether or not a person is a woman.”

J.K. Rowling

>>40444931 (OP)
My chromosomes identify as xx

>>40444931 (OP)
“Nevah fohget: weemeen cunt knew foh sho they'ah weemeen ehless they've had their chromosomes checked, but if a man sezs hee's a woman hee's definitely a woman and it is highly offensive tuu mention his chromosomes, which ah intiaely irrelev'nt tuu whether honot a peh'sonn is a woman.”

J.K. Rowlin' Innit

>>40445350
Fuck mssed a couple of unpronounced ahhs

Thank you for fighting for us when others won't Joanne!

jerkoff rowling, she should be prime ministet

>>40444931 (OP)
why are bongs intentionally obtuse? Are they retarded?

>>40444931 (OP)
What the fuck does this even mean? Does she have a brain tumor or am I just too sober to understand her 190 IQ thought process?

what a midwit. should've stick to writing children's books

>>40445420
They just want to cause maximum harm to others

>>40446168
>women can't know for sure they're women unless they've had their chromosomes checked
referring to ppl saying "you can't tell" and "you don't know your chromosomes" (which is 100% true but arguably has been overextended to the point that it is sort of reasonable for this to be turned against the people saying it in the first place, unfortunately)
>if a man says he's a woman he's definitely a woman and it is highly offensive to mention his chromosomes
referring to self-ID and how tranners will understandably be upset with you for deliberately misgendering them
>which are entirely irrelevant to whether or not a person is a woman
referring to the idea of being transgender itself

each of the which points are valid on their face only until you actually think about them

>>40444931 (OP)
Is that a real quote? That's either the most bad faith thing anyone has ever said about trans women or she's genuinely retarded.

>>40444931 (OP)
>women can't know for sure they're women unless they've had their chromosomes checked
said no one ever. the black mold is causing her to hallucinate straw transwomen

>>40446370
>It's not fair that some people just accept it when "a man" says "he's" a woman meanwhile "actual women" such as myself need to prove our cis womanhood so that we able to effectively keep these trannies who very unfairly aren't even being judged by their chromosomes like us real women are (???????), out and separated from real women's spaces or sports and this in fact is the fault of trannies and degenerates despite the fact that they themselves are in opposition to all of these unfair practices that I am complaining about, as these very practices ("checking" someone's chromosomes to determine whether they are real women) are a result of sensible people like me wanting to keep trannies segregated but it's actually the fault of trannies, let that sink in faggots

I mean I am really attempting to over-charitably spoon-feed her argument to myself here but I still think that it comes off as entirely circular and wholly self defeating. I struggle to genuinely believe that she is this stupid.

>>40446437
Her tweet from yesterday.

>>40446483
>Her tweet from yesterday.
Maybe she really is being slowly poisoned to death by black mold

>>40444931 (OP)
It's perfectly cromulent and succinct in addressing and dismissing the nonsense. It's amazing to me that T managed to kill off any chance with someone who is down with the LGB.

>>40446532
have you perhaps checked your house for mold in the past couple of weeks?

>>40446532
>cromulent
he-he-yeah, heccin' epic simpsons reference, rick

>>40446562
>no comeback but reddit!
Faggot in a dress for you.

>>40446168
It's the fallacy of calling hypocrisy based on two opposing opinions of members within the group, who are at actually odds with each other.
Similar to "the right claim to be for free speech, but support the banning of books!" which intentionally conflates libertarians with Christian fundies in order to make a false claim of hypocrisy in action.
Unless she can produce some evidence that both things were claimed by the same person, in which case the claim would be valid.

>>40446615
my comeback is that you are leddit and you just confirmed that for me. so thanks. don't you get bored of doing this all day every day, leta? how do you even make money? is joanne your sugar mommy?

>>40446763
>intentionally conflates libertarians with Christian fundies
You say this as though the 'House Freedom Caucus' isn't mostly fundies who whine about their 'freedom of speech' being censored by social media while also wanting to ban all mentions of LGBT people in schools. Lolberts are mostly not hypocrites on the free speech question but more garden variety rightoids 10,000% are.

>>40444931 (OP)
She advocated for more chromosome testing specifically for women in the Olympics so I assumed she liked that sort of thing.

>>40446772
exactly, because you're a faggot in a dress. Linetrap walked so you could apparently cost the gays their hard earned rights.

>>40447067
>Linetrap
now that is a name i haven't heard in a long, long time. you know she doesn't go by that anymore, right? as usual, you are a tissue paper human: entirely transparent. you've probably been watching tranny porn for longer than i have lol

>>40447083
exactly, faggot. But there's a difference between getting a thrill or a chuckle from watching porn to the current pushback of men invading women's spaces. Learn the difference instead of screeching about reddit like a stuck lil niglet.

>>40446772
It's reddit to not hate trannies.

>>40444931 (OP)
why does she look like that

>>40444931 (OP)
>Never forget: women can't know for sure they're women unless they've had their chromosomes checked

based on what hon

>>40447412
>getting a thrill
transphobes confirmed for tranny porn watchers. is passoids "invading women's spaces" a turn-on for you?

>>40444931 (OP)
I bet i could inject her with testosterone and end all this bs

>>40447412
>i only like you when i can goon to you
republicoid mindset hang yourself

>>40447879
lotta projection there. I just like watching sex from time to time, usually attached to a skit, there's usually going to be a dick involved. Porn straight gay, lesbian is really all various levels of sideshow, so whatever. This whole phobe thing doesn't work though. I don't even hate you guys. I just recognize where the other side is coming from. It's called empathy, and why you constantly lose the argument to pearl clutches and fuel the fires of right wing mobs world-wide. Now call me a nazi or something next, faggot. I know you need it to get your dicklet hard as you slowly cry jerk about taking down the man or something.

>>40446498
Win

>>40447996
>it's called empathy
>I don't even hate you
>Now call me a nazi or something next, faggot. I know you need it to get your dicklet hard as you slowly cry jerk about taking down the man or something
all i have to say is "you watch tranny porn huh" and you get more defensive than a "faggot in a dress" in public. look in a mirror bud

>>40448087
None, of that was defensive, just calling a spade a spade. You're less original than you think and for
>>40447944 benefit as well
registered republican in a red state to effect primaries, but vote DINO/RINO. The 90's were good until the dot.com bubble.
but anyway back to your sad little jerking it over tranny porn, I watch porn. Porn is fun and in my own private time. It's not the very real discussion of does claiming womanhood as a man makes you eligible for their spaces and set asides, or do we carve off more set asides for just you and thus make the whole identity crisis not matter at all, or just let you wither. Learn the difference, fag.

>>40448326
>I comprehend you only as a sex object and i have a meltie the second i have to move my brain and think about you as an actual person outside of pornography
hmm

>>40444931 (OP)
She lives rent free in your head. Seethe, cope and mald bros, ywnbaw

>>40448365
see you're trying to boil it down too much. that wouldn't even be a perception if you as a group had better optics. But you've either been bearded ladies, monty python go tos, or porn degens. So the few of you that before the mid 2010s came around that were cheerfully daily users at the library or able to hop in the gracery restroom, no hassle, just going about your day and such. You got absolutely reamed. because you can't fight the sideshow view and only attempt to cast some shade with opponents about it here when you get called out by a billionaire on twitter. It's a sad life for you.

>>40448326
>>40448433
you're even defensive about being defensive. i could put a random string of letters and numbers in this text box and you'd basically just troll yourself, at this point