Im a transbian who works a dead end minimum wage office job. My coworker said if i dont do x they will bend me over their knee.
My response was just "uhh.. ok?" (Uncomfortable). But later that day i sent a email to HR about that incident.

Am i overreacting? It just felt completly inappropriate and not workplace worthy.
The thing is, the coworker who did this, no one likes, but is always being protected by our manager because theyre personal friends.

>I'm a transbian

And of course you're annoying autistic and no fun. You should have let him bend you over his knee and become his work sex slave. Also they will probably end up firing you so trusting the system is a huge mistake.

>>40445459 (OP)
Did you write you were a transbian solely so you would get more negative responses to this?

>>40445491
>will probably end up firing you so trusting the system is a huge mistake.

Ye maybe.
Its fucked we still live in such a world...

>>40445561
Its funny i guess

>>40445459 (OP)
All transbians like you should suffer max dysphoria and kys instead of existing. Fuck you, i hope you get fired you insufferable cunt.

>>40445459 (OP)
>gets sexually harassed
>am I in the wrong for this?
what

>>40445745
Because i might get fired. So in a sense, that might mean im wrong. Morally not perhaps. But the fact i notified Hr. Iv never done that over harassment.
I might get fired. Who knows.. even tho i did nothing wrong..

It wasnt sexual harassment. She's just an old hag who no one likes, in her menopause years taking it out on everyone else that she chose career over family and now is alone and bitter in a dead end company where everyone hates her.

>>40445730
>insufferable cunt.

What makes me insufferable?

>>40445803
You didn't let a moid walk all over you. To moids this is the greatest possible offense.

>>40445459 (OP)
>Im a transbian who works a dead end minimum wage office job
And I'm sure HR will take your side instead of just replacing you with someone equally worthless but less of a headache

>>40445872
>You didn't let a moid walk all over you. To moids this is the greatest possible offense.

Damn.... the thing with those types of molds tho is theyre never attractive. Thats what annoys me about incels. If they were like yaoi tier guys their behavior could be excused sometimes at least

>>40445886
>And I'm sure HR will take your side instead of just replacing you with someone equally worthless but less of a headache

Yea, therein lies the problem.... thats why im asking if im in the wrong...
I guess part of growing is realizing you can be right but still in the wrong.
If they wanna fire me tho to hell with em, i bet i can find a job that pays better. Coworkers should respect each other

>>40445919
Being punished for verbal slights is ruining society. If someone gets fired every time he says something cringe, and they won't give him the reason he was fired to protect themselves from a lawsuit, the guy will never learn to not be cringe. He'll just move onto the next job and be equally cringe and get fired again. OR he has enough pattern recognition to know he was fired for being cringe but not exactly what the cringe was, and resort to being completely silent and borderline non-functional at work because communication = being fired.
Nobody can say anything safely anymore, it's all microaggressions and HR incidents. And that's what the jews want. To control language, and by extension thought.

The correct thing to do for verbal problems is to tell him to his face that was fucking weird, don't say it again, and if he doesn't get better then wait until the weirdo touches you and then get the guy fired because it actually crossed a line that's respectable and sensible to have.

>>40445948
It wasnt a guy tho.... its a woman in menopause freshly. No one likes her. And she knows she is out line.
Iv tried to talk to her before but she just goes back to the old way of things.

>>40445958
Point still stands, wait for her to smack your ass or something and then get her fired. Physical is taken way more seriously.

>>40445986
Thats obviously never gonna happen. And even if it did i couldnt prove it. Im just being honest

>>40445948
>If someone gets fired every time he says something cringe
No one fucking does this. It may be what we fantasize about happening when we feel slighted. But if anyone is getting fired for "verbal slights" it's actually because it's a pattern of behaviour they've been warned about in the past.
OP even says:
>the coworker who did this, no one likes
So even just reporting it allows HR to stack up ammunition to fire the cunt. Maybe nothing comes from an individual report, but someday the wrong person is going to get pissed off, look at the HR file and see the stack of shit, and say, "Nah, that's fucking enough of that."

>>40446095
>No one fucking does this. It may be what we fantasize about happening when we feel slighted.
Obviously the employee in question is still around because she's a (vagina)woman. A man can absolutely be fired for one verbal harassment and it happens constantly.

>>40446106
I'm not going to deny that gender biases can be a factor in how people assess the severity of such things or the appropriate discipline.
But if you think men are getting fired over single instances of anything but the most atrocious harassment (obviously threats or incitement to violence are a different level), you're either making shit up whole cloth or you're deceived by reporting bias (e.g. a probationary new hire is thrown out for the slightest indication something is wrong, regardless of the nature of the incident).
>t. works at a trade union and sees this shit constantly

Let's see your fucking examples. Because here are mine:
>“Zero tolerance” policies are useful workplace devices. They speak clearly, and send a strong message. They do not, however, replace an employer’s obligation, in every case of discipline, to consider all relevant individual circumstances of the case, including the personal disciplinary record of the employee. Disciplinary responses must be reasonable and proportionate to the offence, and considered in the context of the employment relationship.
>https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onla/doc/2012/2012canlii51437/2012canlii51437.html

>Reverting to the Wm. Scott & Co. analysis, had I been persuaded that the Grievor had been guilty of harassment or similar misconduct, I was offered nothing by the Employer to substantiate an argument that its decision to terminate his employment was reasonable and not an excessive response. The Employer had an obligation to contemplate the relevance of the numerous mitigating factors that the jurisprudence recognizes. Nitta Gelatin Canada eschewed that opportunity and relied solely on its characterization of the alleged offences as constituting “zero tolerance” circumstance necessitating the Grievor’s discharge. In that, its analysis was patently flawed and cannot be supported.
>https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onla/doc/2020/2020canlii80318/2020canlii80318.html