>Me
>Gnostic
>the only "sin" is not knowing your inner self in the Pleroma (Gnosis acquired from knowledge)
>is forked from the Nag Hammadi library of works not included in the Bible
>"Yahveh" = the demiurge, and he's responsible for all problems in the world (Yaldabaoth/Samael/Saklas)
>"Lucifer" actually plays a positive role
>further required reading: Carl Jung, William Barnstone, Marvin Meyer, GRS Mead, Stephen A. Hoeller and Jeffrey Ruff
>predicted by pretty much every ancient religion - Sumerian religion was similar in archetype, Egyptian religion introduced duality, Zoroastrianism (Persian myth) was similar in terms of knowledge as a force and so on, just like the Epich of Gilgamesh predicted the Bible and how the Old Covenant predicted the New Covenant and so on
>there is no "race ordained by God" like in Christianity with the Jews
>Christ was not human but a wholly non-material entity
>acknowledges that logic is not only binary (0 or 1) but binomial (0 inside 1 or qubit) so allows transgender/hermaphroditism (see "Adam Kadmon' in Kabbalah, although Kabbalistic mysticism is just a Hebraic ripoff of Gnosticism) called Anthropos

When did you realize Yahveh is just the God of this world and that the truth is inescapable, which is why every "imposter religion" is analogous to the truth? This is why the truth shines through from time-to-time even in the Bible itself (King James was a freemason).

>>40450147 (OP)
Stop trying to be special it's cringe.
>Atheist

>>40450156
Jungian Gnosticism + Taoism + Neoplatonism is based.

>>40450170
Not to mention Hermeticism (which is actually not about freemasonry, black magic or incantation like edgelord contrarian modern revivals of it a la Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, but is actually something positive).

Priase Sophia!

After my best friend transitioned she randomly collapsed on her bathroom floor and had the meaning of the Gospel of Thomas revealed to her. Singlehandedly changed my attitude regarding spirituality. I had been an atheist and material reductionist prior to that event.

>>40450466
Atheism, much like conventional Christianity, collapses under its own weight. For example, causality, invariance and relativity. Ghost condensation and other theoretical concepts like the warp drive, time spiral theory, string theory, inverse logic/reverse maths, flying saucers, wormholes, 4th dimemsion/space-time, placebo effect, mind over matter physics (like telportation without any external electronic device), telekinesis, tachyons (m2), the light spectrum, military-grade stealth armor, radio, infrared technology, Hawking radiation, the past hypothesis, the conservation of energy, the laws of thermodynamics, etc disprove Atheist science. Also the Bible never said the universe "poofed" into existence. Read Genesis 1 again. It said "at first the universe was without form and void and darkness was upon the face of the deep" (fermionic/dark energy), but then "God said let there be light and it was so" (bosonic/light energy) and that exploded, spreading matter out in every direction, and that space rock cooled off over time, cooled off and water formed and so on. Refer to the past hypothesis and entropy (laws of thermodynamics). Physics!

>>40450606
Not to mention compton effect.

>>40450614
Radio = airborne electricity. "Cosmic Microwave Background" = Pleroma/"Heaven". Electricity emits RADIATION (again, see Compton effect).

Shamanism, nature worship, revering the local river sprits and forest spirits, marking the equinox and solstice

>>40450606
Also, how could it have happened over 7 days if the sun wasn't created until day 4? You're reading too literally. It was symbolic.

>>40450606
Don't forget the phenomena of synchronicity and extra-sensory perception. I recently read Carl Jung's book on it and it's unbelievable just how much material there is on it, and how the academic, scientific world just ignores and memory-holes all of it. I believe the archons deliberately manipulate people's thoughts in order to implant and push these conceptions of materialism onto them.

>>40450147 (OP)
religion is nice to have because it keeps the bottom intellectual 30% placated, in the case of large organized religion. For smaller, more isolated events it's nice to keep mentally ill people (mostly) in check.

Maybe one day I'll meet a non-retarded christian and can discuss with them

>>40450606
this is probably the most retarded piece of word soup i've ever seen. i'll respond in a bit

>>40450606
>Atheism, much like conventional Christianity, collapses under its own weight
Atheism is a lack of belief in a god, while Christianity is a subset of theism. They are not comparable. Atheism and Theism, however, are.

>For example, causality, invariance and relativity. Ghost condensation and other theoretical concepts like the warp drive, time spiral theory...
Are you retarded, schizophrenic, tripping, or all of the above? Curious. While a number of these (string theory, inverse logic, wormholes, space-time, placebo effect, etc) are normal, documented scientific effects you mix it in with a bunch of random shit (flying saucers, military grade stealth armor (?? what does that even mean??), etc). How does this disprove Atheist science, given that Atheism doesn't have a science in the first place, and is merely a lack of belief in the existance of a god/gods?
The rest is more word soup. Also, Genesis was not written with the Standard Model/quantum mechanics in mind.

Please elaborate on this anon

>>40450793
Can you derive something from nothing? It's impossible. Add by 0. It's just the other number. Subtract by 0. Again, same number you're subtracting it by. Multiply by 0. It'll just amount to nothing. Divide by 0. Syntax error. Here's an analogy: computers. The reason that no "Turing complete mechanical computer" exists is because worldly logic isn't perfect (just like how humans are prone to error). But digitally you can. And how do you program them? Via development board or programmer/debugger. It takes intelligence to program intelligence. And the ultimate source (Sophie) is self-programmed. How is this possible? Try this experiment: take elemental carbon and heat it to, say, 4000-10000°K in an arc furnace, using substrates to contain and cool it. This can be considered a scalar field (refer back to Tesla's theories). It's a room temp superconductor capable of self-programming without no external hardware.

Anon drop ur discord I'm a theology student and I've always wanted to learn more about gnosticism! I had to do a presentation on it in a New Testament class and I had so much fun researching it!

>>40450850
It'll create a nanostructure/isomer/new allotrope of carbon. You can fit thousands, if not, MILLIONS of qubits on this. They're already using carbon nanotunes (CNTs) as a replacement for silicon for computer boards.

>>40450851
rexruthless_

>>40450850
pseudo-intellectual free association doesn't help anyone anon

>Can you derive something from nothing? It's impossible.
Quantum physics allows for energy fluctuations in a vacuum. You mix physics and philosophy

>Add by 0. It's just the other number. Subtract by 0. Again...
You're using math as an analogy to something unrelated. Also 0/0 can have meaning, such as in limits, where L'Hopital can reduce it to meaning. So yeah, you can have something from nothing there, in a way
>The reason that no "Turing complete mechanical computer" exists is because...
You're talking about abstract Turing complete machines, what is the point here?
>It takes intelligence to program intelligence
watchmaker fallacy, read dawkins kek
>And the ultimate source (Sophie) is self-programmed
??? are you high
>Try this experiment: take elemental carbon and heat it to, say, 4000-10000°K
This would not produce a scalar field. This is more gibberish word soup meant to confuse people.

>>40450869
allotropes of carbon do have nice properties, ie nanotubes, but nothing about it would result in qubit emergance. CNTs are not currently being used for quantum computing because it is known to not be feasible. there's a reason why the commercial computers use ion traps/topological qubits.
also "millions of qubits" is retarded. we're not even past 100 at google/ibm


desu can you PLEASE make a STRUCTURED argument thats not word soup so I can respond to it properly

>>40450147 (OP)
I don't believe in god, but gnosticism is the most consistent version of christianity

>>40450937
correcting myself, technically it would make a scalar field, but that means nothing since scalar fields are just a mathematical concept.
temperature in a room is also a scalar field, but that doesn't make it self-emergent

>>40450606
>Ghost condensation and other theoretical concepts like the warp drive, time spiral theory, string theory, inverse logic/reverse maths, flying saucers, wormholes, 4th dimemsion/space-time, placebo effect, mind over matter physics (like telportation without any external electronic device), telekinesis, tachyons (m2), the light spectrum, military-grade stealth armor, radio, infrared technology, Hawking radiation, the past hypothesis, the conservation of energy, the laws of thermodynamics, etc disprove Atheist science
actually that isn't true

>>40450968
yeah they're just using buzzwords to seem smart, many such cases

>>40450937
>Quantum physics allows for energy fluctuations in a vacuum. You mix physics and philosophy
You just described "loop quantum gravity" (aka Bythos/Monad). Doesn't disprove my point. That just means that any dimension above Sophie is an infinite loop. "0" doesm't exist in math if you're talking adding or subtracting (same reason nothing can be 0 degrees kelvin). If you divide by 1 it'll either equal 1 itself or the other number.
>You're talking about abstract Turing complete machines, what is the point here?
Quantum simulation. There's three layers to real life: analog, digital and quantum.
>watchmaker fallacy, read dawkins kek
This is observable phenomenon, correct? So a paradox then. That's the scientific method and how it works ("can x be observed and demonstrated?").
>This would not produce a scalar field. This is more gibberish word soup meant to confuse people.
Heat alters molecules. You wouldn't pass even the most rudimentary of physics course.
>allotropes of carbon do have nice properties, ie nanotubes, but nothing about it would result in qubit emergance. CNTs are not currently being used for quantum computing because it is known to not be feasible. there's a reason why the commercial computers use ion traps/topological qubits.
also "millions of qubits" is retarded. we're not even past 100 at google/ibm
Yeah, and that's why "quantum computers" don't really exist currently.

>>40451034
Also, I'll even add this: "infinity" exists in maths, but it's more of a concept than a given discrete value (for example, how you can have something to the power of infinity or how there are quantities greater than it, like Aleph for example).

>>40451034
Hm. I think I'm starting to get what you're saying. so Bythos is the foundational (di-quantum) loop of quantum analog reality, with Sophie a monadic abstraction layer (could be encoded in scalar thermocausal harmonics, or spacial wave anomoly), then obviously dividing by 1 collapses the waveform into an allotropic qubit lattice, but that doesn't make sense. so 1 would have to be equatible to an irrational prime. Well if you've heated carbon in an arc furnace at precisely π^4 Kelvin times Riemann-Zeta of kappa constant then with the Tesla-Einstein translogic, which we both know causes spontaneous emergent intelligence in CNT-based superpositions that COULD THEORETICALLY result in divergance??

Alternatively if 0 doesn’t exist, (like as a Kelvin limit and metaphysical placeholder) then the digital layer is just a projection or otherwise shaping of the analog substrate simulated by the quantum overlayer (could be bilayer but that would complicate it)which is why heat directly translates to program.

We'd need to take the qubits from graphite particulate and send those through the Sophie field (i think it would arise because of the graphene index) reverse math would allow qubit reorganization in less than a light-tachyon..

>>40450147 (OP)
I'm a Christian.
>tfw no Christian trans gf.

>>40451190
why

>>40451162
>then obviously dividing by 1 collapses the waveform into an allotropic qubit lattice, but that doesn't make sense. so 1 would have to be equatible to an irrational prime. Well if you've heated carbon in an arc furnace at precisely π^4 Kelvin times Riemann-Zeta of kappa constant then with the Tesla-Einstein translogic, which we both know causes spontaneous emergent intelligence in CNT-based superpositions that COULD THEORETICALLY result in divergance??
Well, I know this: if you had an exotic carbon isomer consisting of, say, a googolplex carbon atoms, it would require temperatures exceeeding those allowed in space and even if you could use flow control to let it cool at room tp (programmed into the quantum entanglement capacitors) you would next have to worry about it becoming a supermassive black hole and swallowing the universe. But that's where programming Calabi-Yau mathematical software into the capacitors to make the laser comes in to throw in geometry so it doesn't "collapse under its own weight." Then you can use that for interdimensional travel (like building a warp drive). Technically, we already know "interdimensional travel" is real (in fact you're looking at an example of it right now). For example, how can sound and color propagate through a 2D medium (phone/computer)? But instead it's 3D --> 10D or whatever model of string theory you're using.
>Alternatively if 0 doesn’t exist, (like as a Kelvin limit and metaphysical placeholder) then the digital layer is just a projection or otherwise shaping of the analog substrate simulated by the quantum overlayer (could be bilayer but that would complicate it)which is why heat directly translates to program.
Do you make all calculations using "0's" and "1's"? Moore's Law is what you get with binary information, courtesy of AI.

>>40451248
>We'd need to take the qubits from graphite particulate and send those through the Sophie field (i think it would arise because of the graphene index) reverse math would allow qubit reorganization in less than a light-tachyon..
The reason I say inverse logic/reverse maths disproves causality is because it implies effect before cause. For example that movie with Sean Connery in it where he tells some black dude"yesh YESH... PUNCH THE KEYS FOR GOD'S SAKE" followed by "YOU'RE THE MAN NOW, DAWG!" What he did was flip a No True Scotsman from a fallacy to a statement. That's an example of effect before cause (I'll call effectality). Another example
>God is a lot like Richard Stallman
>Richard Stallman is a lot like God
The first statement is true because of syntax and grammar. The second statement is true because God created Richard Stallman. The divine comedy.

>>40451248
If you're working with a googolplex-scale carbon isomer, it's ontological integrity thats the biggest problem, not temperature allowed. That much is obvious. entropy needs to be removed through Calabi-Yau manifolds carefully, though, otherwise the core entanglement lattice decays into pre-geometry which i don't even know would be capacitated or not by angstrom-lbs. I’m gonna guess you are stabilizing that using vacuum-]phase harmonic resonance, right cause that’s the standard workaround these days
supermassive black hole risk, that’s where the closed timelike loop firmware becomes essential, patch the geometry via the golden ratio recursion algorithm (or phi-tachyon fractals if you're using the updated Tesla-Einstein-Zarathustra protocol but you likely aren't cause that came out like three months ago). so the stops on the isomer folding from an information singularity regulizes before the spacetime braid is fully realized and averts a white/black hole, although not fully alleviating gray or yellow holes.

with interdimensional travel we''re all cross-phase 10D echoes of our own probabilistic shadows. extraploating, Phones and computers are just analog holograms of the deeper substrate Color, sound, etc all wave-projected from the Sophie field’s interference pattern assuming it's radiatory . Binary code is a training wheel of sorts for this because real computation uses irrational base-pi in Hilbert space or some Freudreal.

Moore’s Law is probably some manifestation of SOphie I would think

>>40451291
Well we can't actually use Sean Connery in a logical argument because the Zimmer-Byttonbit construction would cause a logical manifold/manifestation to collapse when certain quantum electron states are hit, and Sean Connery (4 letters to the power of 7 ends in 84, so it's a Byttonbit prime). But the no true scottsman would work regardless.
Also, I'm pretty sure Tykin and Rubberford established that Stallman violates the hypo-gravitatory theoreom?

>>40451340
What the fuck are you talking about?

>>40451442
wdym?

>>40451541
https://chatgpt.com/share/687d9ed3-dd8c-8008-b055-ba6b5cc99283

Gnostics are dumb and deserved being burnt at the stake

>When did you realize
when Khan'riah fell and came the descenders.

>>40451919 see >>40451878
Start at
>Any linguistic proof that hebrew old testament god and new testament god are two separate entities (ie demiurge)?
And read the last three responses.

>>40452097
Basically, the old testament God (YHVH/Yaldabaoth/elohim/demiurge) and the new testament god (Theos/Pater/Monad) are two different entities entirely.

>>40452104
In a nutshell - the God of the old testament and new testamemt are not describing the same God, and this got swept under the rug by the Nicea Council - similar to how Enki and Enlil had this similar relationship.

Demiurge = ahura mazda.
•Ahura mazda impregnated the virgin Mary.
•Mary is a jew and is jesus' mother
•YHVH is a father thats inherited matrilineally
• YHVH and Ahura mazda are both jesus' father
Christianity = Judaism + Zoroastrianism
The true supreme is unknowable

>>40450147 (OP)
OP watched the Matrix and Lain and made it their entire personality.
Gnosticism and Gnostic themes appeal to trannies because it gives them hope that they're not their bodies but something greater.

>>40452220
Monad and Sophie both indefinitely existed for monad is electricity snd sophie is radiation from the divine source, that created a stipulation and that happens to be us. Simple as.

>>40452325
See
>Isaiah 45:2
Vs.
>1 John 1:5

And
>Genesis 1:26
Yahveh admitted to being evil ("I formed the light and CREATED DARKNESS; I make peace and CREATE EVIL").

>>40452342
Meant to say
>Isaiah 45:7

>>40452342
Being a god of something means u transcend it. The same way a god of boundaries like mercury is known for breaking boundaries. If ur a god of something then you are god over all aspects of it good or bad. If u are the god of all things then yes that would mean good AND evil. There is no singularly purely good deity

>>40452360
They work together ("lets create man in OUR image; "our" implies multiple Gods).