HELP A VIRUS TURNED EVERY HUMAN MAN INTO AN ANTHRO WOMAN AHHHHH

>>40451371 (OP)
>twink erasure

>>40451371 (OP)
So he fused with the rabbit?

>>40451438
yeah, because look see he has rabbit ears now and the bunny had a little bow and now he has the little bow

and what's strange is the character who fused him with the rabbit also looks to be some sort of rabbit / human hybrid herself, implying she herself may have fallen victim to the same malevolent magic that she's now inflicting on others

>>40451819
Wow

>>40451371 (OP)
Did she just kill the rabbit???

>>40454813
n0 they became ONE like The Fly

>>40454813
effectively both the twink and rabbit are dead

>>40451371 (OP)
Please tell me she has a cute carrot (caged if possible).

Anyway we need to implement a global training and adoption program for those girls, they need now a good owner and a cute bowl and a cute leash

>>40454862
Death is just a cultural concept we defined to roughly describe a physical phenomenon.
But when we move beyond everyday life, and start to interrogate the true boundaries of the concept, it gets messy.
Why should we think the rabbit and the twink are both dead? There is another consciousness that exists in continuity with both of them. Both terminate at the same place the new one begins, the same as how a new day's consciousness begins with yesterday's consciousness falling asleep.
The only quirk is that what was two are now one, but why should that be disallowed? Can we prove the rabbit has no element in the new consciousness? Perhaps the rabbit's sense of consciousness is so rudimentary that it overlaps fully with the twinks and is effectively redundant?
Why can't we merge consciousnesses without "death" in your framework? What purpose does drawing the line there serve? Does it not lead to uncomfortable conclusions in this hypothetical universe where humans and rabbits can fuse? Would it not be more practical for the inhabitants of such an alternate universe to conclude this is a "normal" experience?

>>40455155
sybau