dont worry trannies
we're working on a cure :D

>>40494086 (OP)
I don't see the point like it was already detectable when a fetus will have down's so they simply got aborted, what's the point of this sci-fi shit when aborting the fetus fixes the issue just fine?

>>40494204
Abortion is immoral and pure evil.

>>40494086 (OP)
uhh and what do they do with the chromosome sized hole
>>40494459
no doubt about it

>>40494204
Literal fascism to murder the disabled

>>40494764
not sure if this is satire

>>40494204
>No the problem isnt that we as a society absolutely refuse to take care of our own people instead preferring to funnel as much money upwards as possible
>The problem is with disabled people existing
>Therfore we must genocide.

>>40494764
Aren't moralfags like you usually against gene editing anyways? I don't see who this option appeals to

>>40495262
A fetus isn't a human retard

>>40494204
>all the replies happy creating more downies
So moral!

>>40494086 (OP)
yay... eugenics!

>>40494764
An embryo isn't a person

>>40494764
and that is bad how?

dead-serious possible retard here why is it bad to make sure future humans are not disabled? i do not have downs or know anyone who does so i guess this sort of thing is outside my vital periphery

>>40494459
if you want to raise a retard that will train all your money, go ahead, raise one.

>>40498097
maybe using the word "retard" here was a little tone-deaf (i feel like "tone-deaf" is maybe also bad?? idfk please i am asking in earnest)

>>40497993
we must spread congenital disease as much as possible
to do otherwise is bigotry
fuck ableists

>>40498097
People are scared that 'next they'll come for me' but they don't realize that they only have a good life because society already comes for thieves, obviously disabled before birth, etc.
That's why eugenics was popular before WWII and took a dive after, because the narrative went from us vs them (which did justify abuses!) to 'they're eventually coming for all of us!(which prevents solving real problems)'

Hopefully, eventually things will return to a happy medium, but in the mean time I try to speak out against both extremes. Gene editing before birth is almost always good. Keep it up scientists.

>>40494086 (OP)
How early must this chromosome be caught and deleted for the fetus to develop normally? I imagine after certain amount of gestation time the effects are set in stone

>>40498922
thank you for such a thoughtful response :) this is, i guess, my perspective as well, although i was not aware that humanity was ever really gung-ho about this sort of thing. in hindsight it doesn't really make sense that we would not have been but i guess i just took the current general distaste for granted. makes me feel a lot less unreasonable lol

>>40499070
:):) I'm glad <3
Thanks for being positive back atcha ;D

>>40494086 (OP)
down syndrome is caused by a missing chromosome

>>40500195
no it's caused by having an extra copy of chromosome 21

>>40500230
that's retarded

>>40495262
>The problem is with disabled people existing
Unironically yes. Downies can at least be functional, but there's lots of other mental-vegetable disorders that do nothing but create drag on parents and civilization.