Thread 40601418 - /lgbt/ [Archived: 415 hours ago]

Anonymous
8/4/2025, 8:46:12 AM No.40601418
1748788672418603
1748788672418603
md5: 91a49ba389099c460b673d28abeaf929🔍
it's funny that trannies call themselves "Failed males" when in reality the only failed male is the type of person who comes to this board to troll lol
Replies: >>40601430 >>40601655 >>40601672 >>40601862
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 8:48:18 AM No.40601430
>>40601418 (OP)
Both can be failed males.
Replies: >>40601632
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 9:27:07 AM No.40601632
>>40601430
actually true i guess in the mtf case its a good thing to be a failed male
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 9:32:58 AM No.40601655
fd17995wh_1
fd17995wh_1
md5: e894529597ed200adaac14bd132484f9🔍
>>40601418 (OP)
>failed male
what would a failed female be?
Replies: >>40601661
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 9:33:31 AM No.40601661
>>40601655
iunno a terf or something ig
Replies: >>40601672 >>40601920
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 9:36:26 AM No.40601672
>>40601418 (OP)
no those are failed men but theyre still males. tranners failed at even being males
>>40601661
true
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:11:57 AM No.40601862
>>40601418 (OP)
I mean most people that make fun of trannies didn't really care about raiding until trannies went after their communities. For example basedteens became 10x more transphobic after /qa/ got locked because a minority of basedposters raided /lgbt/. They didn't just turn against transgenderism because a tranny criticized their posts.

Also depending on your idea of masculinity anti-trans raiders are the furthest thing from failed males, They actively enforce gender norms by bullying people that don't fit in and therefore defend their communities like a stereotypical man would.
Replies: >>40601869
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:13:14 AM No.40601869
>>40601862
>For example basedteens became 10x more transphobic after /qa/ got locked because a minority of basedposters raided /lgbt/. They didn't just turn against transgenderism because a tranny criticized their posts.

HAHAHAHHAAH

>be soiteens
>do the ONE global rule you're not allowed to break (no raiding)
>get punished for it
>>WTF THE TRANNIES WTF WTF
Replies: >>40601908
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:20:19 AM No.40601908
>>40601869
The janitors should've just banned the people that raided instead of deleting the entire board
Replies: >>40601915
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:21:19 AM No.40601915
>>40601908
Yeah haha just ban the people that were raiding and were the reason why IP count got removed from threads due to their evasion
Replies: >>40601934 >>40601968
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:21:46 AM No.40601920
>>40601661
nah, they can get a guy if they want

their problem is being picky, becoming obese, or parapooner AAP tendencies

or, worst of all, becoming a fat AAP nonbinary "lesbian"
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:23:16 AM No.40601934
>>40601915
>Yeah haha just ban the people that were raiding
Yes
>and were the reason why IP count got removed from threads due to their evasion
there's never been any explanation for why the IP counter was removed
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:27:38 AM No.40601968
>>40601915
Also it's worth mentioning that the IP counter was removed well after /qa/ had been locked so even if your claim that it was removed because of basedteens is true it only proves that locking /qa/ made the ban evasion problem worse over time, not better.
Replies: >>40601974
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:28:16 AM No.40601974
>>40601968
>it only proves that locking /qa/ made the ban evasion problem worse over time, not better.
exactly, it literally proves my point that a banwave would've done nothing and deleting the board was one of the only things they could do
Replies: >>40601999
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:33:01 AM No.40601999
>>40601974
No, locking the board just made basedteens hate the jannies and trannies more and encouraged them to organize offsite. If the jannies had just banned the rulebreakers and communicated with the board's users better things would've gradually improved or at the very least stayed the same.
Replies: >>40602010
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:35:00 AM No.40602010
>>40601999
nah /qa/ had it coming, and thank god they moved offsite too because of those shooters now being attatched to it rather than here
Replies: >>40602031
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:39:12 AM No.40602031
>>40602010
I don't recall any school shooters from /qa/ or the pre-clean stable sharty. Most of the edgelords on the sharty now came to the site after soot quit and was replaced by kuz. I don't really see why an entire board deserved to be ruined because some of its jokes were distasteful.
Replies: >>40602048
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:41:35 AM No.40602048
1743260924623564
1743260924623564
md5: e959272f45a6fb9f15874daf52aea3aa🔍
>>40602031
solomon henderson was lol.
>Some of its jokes were distasteful
is a funny way of saying
>broke one of the only global rules on the site, raiding

all of the jokes there are distasteful ironypoisoned crap by people who champion ugliness because they can't create anything real for themselves
Replies: >>40602116
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:51:36 AM No.40602116
>>40602048
>solomon henderson was lol.
That was January of this year. /qa/ was locked years ago in November of 2021. I think you need to lower your Spironolactone dosage because your brain seems to have gotten the timeline mixed up.
>broke one of the only global rules on the site, raiding
Again, you're implying the entire board was involved in raiding /lgbt/ when this isn't the case
Replies: >>40602127
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:53:45 AM No.40602127
>>40602116
>>solomon henderson was lol.
>That was January of this year. /qa/ was locked years ago in November of 2021. I think you need to lower your Spironolactone dosage because your brain seems to have gotten the timeline mixed up.
good thing i said he was involved with the sharty lol and that it was a good thing /qa/ closed because otherwise he would've been attatched to this site. I do not care about whatever alt right grooming pipeline you've gone down, the board literally raided and got punished for it, and it's hilarious seeing teenagers having tantrums about this
Replies: >>40602163
Anonymous
8/4/2025, 10:59:50 AM No.40602163
>>40602127
>good thing i said he was involved with the sharty lol and that it was a good thing /qa/ closed because otherwise he would've been attatched to this site
But the sharty only went down the path of becoming an alt-right grooming hub because /qa/ was locked and the userbase became more jaded as a result. If basedteens had remained on /qa/ it's very unlikely such a thing would've occurred.
>the board literally raided and got punished for it, and it's hilarious seeing teenagers having tantrums about this
Again, the issue isn't that the raiders were punished, the issue is lack of clear communication and censorship from the jannies. Deleting an entire board was far too extreme and made the problem worse.