>>40645749>Tho I'm okay with LGB's sticking together.I'm not opposed to it on some contextual issues when they arise, but in general, I as a man, have no mutual struggle with women. Our experiences are entirely different, as are how society treats us. And while I'm not a misogynist, I'm tired of women's dependence on men, overall.
>At least it's about sexuality. The rest of the alphabet has nothing to do with us.I agree and while I have nothing against trans people, they are a medical/psychological issue and that implies that the rest of us are, too by proximity, which I object too. And as to the alphabet - all our letters have our shame: the G and B have a disgusting level of promiscuity. L's are known for having failed relationships, along with the obnoxiousness of dykes and of course, the T's and their mountain of baggage. We all cumulatively make each other look worse and it's setting us all collectively back. Really, I wish the LGBT never existed so I didn't have to be associated with it.
>>40645751Well, that's their struggle, then and it's nowhere as bad as a man's. They can deal with it on their own and I think they should.
>>40645759This is such bullshit. The closeted homosexuals are far more guilty of what you're accusing (see Roy Cohn). This is why I say LGBT is contradictory. We aren't a monolithic entity all going in the same direction. Sexuality has become over-politicized.