>>40795780
No obviously not, but OP is reimagining patriarchal norms of behavior in which women are told to do such similar things in the name of biblical gender roles, and applying it to transwomen implicitly. Essentially, it's taking the already existing structure of gender norms via patriarchy, as patriarchy is the typical structure by which we all have come to relate to gender as imposed upon us, and creating a fantasy scenario in which transwomen/gay bottoms are included into the social pressures women face.
This may be hard to understand for you, as why someone would make a post like this. So let me do my best to explain:
OP is either a transwoman/gay-bottom who is writing this from the perspective of psychosexual emotional release after experiencing a lifetime of "othering," whereby sexual themes, as in this and in almost all sexual media, include a twisting of psychology towards the darker elements of human societal trauma being *accepted* so that they may be reprocessed and the user may find an element of psychological ease or release. In this case, it's an acceptance of the darker elements of patriarchy, which is actually implicitly acknowledged in the eroticism itself, though it may be hard to see, as bad, via the fantastical transformation of being totally shut off from any kind of acceptance in normative social structures as themselves psycho-sexually into one in which there is an element of acceptance within the, albeit, still brutal and oppressive system.
Think of it like imagining you were rich, because you are poor, despite the fact that to "be rich" itself relies upon a social system in which wealth inequality, i.e. the transfer of the rewards of one's labor to another's, must exist at all.
1/2
