← Home ← Back to /lgbt/

Thread 41044676

30 posts 6 images /lgbt/
Anonymous No.41044676 [Report] >>41044699 >>41044744 >>41044774 >>41044812 >>41044857 >>41044937 >>41044953 >>41044974 >>41045172 >>41045321 >>41046702 >>41046719 >>41046787 >>41046828
Is gatekeeping that bad?
I feel like the influx of autistic trenders/perverted men have destroyed the image of trans people and now genuine dysphorics are seen the same as someone that puts 0 effort into their transition while talking about their "princess wand". if doctors could actually be trusted would you be more open to transmedicalism?
Anonymous No.41044699 [Report]
>>41044676 (OP)
dysphorics are like 1% of trans people
it's over, theres no way to reverse whats been done
Anonymous No.41044744 [Report] >>41044753 >>41044912
>>41044676 (OP)
>is gatekeeping that bad
yes
>if doctors could be trusted
no
Anonymous No.41044753 [Report] >>41044912
>>41044744
if we were gatekeeping to actual dysphoric people why do you think its a bad thing? im genuinly asking in good faith.
Anonymous No.41044774 [Report] >>41044825 >>41044936 >>41044950
>>41044676 (OP)
gatekeeping is the only way that the trans community survives

autistic fetishists have to be kept out at all costs, they don't have dysphoria, they're not trans
Anonymous No.41044812 [Report] >>41044853 >>41044959
>>41044676 (OP)

Transition between genders doesnt exist and probably never will. I’m already fine with you brutalising your own body if it’s at your expense, you dont brainwash childre, don’t invade womens spaces, dont police my speech or association.

Ultimately you and the autists are in the same boat. The fact you are more earnest in your feelings of womanhood does nothing to the inauthetincity of your womanhood. Same for passing better.

It’s like the dofference between someone who pisses their pants and someone who shits their pants. The distinction is more important to you than to someone who doesn’t soil themselves at all.
Anonymous No.41044825 [Report]
>>41044774

Womanhood isnt your gate to keep. Trespassing is the only thing that keeps the illusion of a trans community alive.
Anonymous No.41044853 [Report]
>>41044812
ur not real
Anonymous No.41044857 [Report]
>>41044676 (OP)
I:ve been saying it for years

TAGPD
Emily of 4chan !vOczjEBNSI No.41044912 [Report]
>>41044744
this
>>41044753
The trouble is that actual dysphoric trans women look and sound like mentally ill men, who are exactly the sort of people the cisf "ally" doctors love to gatekeep.

HRT should be over the counter.
There's no fixing optics while palestine isn't free.
Emily of 4chan !vOczjEBNSI No.41044936 [Report]
>>41044774
10% of transwomen have ASD and two thirds have some other form of mental illness or neurodivergence.
You're going to be gatekeeping the genuine cases while letting only the radfem commies transition.

How do you think you personally do in that environment?
Anonymous No.41044937 [Report]
>>41044676 (OP)
How would you even enforce gatekeeping?
Anonymous No.41044950 [Report] >>41046681
>>41044774
I'm autistic, fetishistic, and I still have dysphoria. I'm an ineffectual introvert boymoder & I don't ever hurt trans optics because I never declare myself trans IRL or online (except here), plus I put a lot of effort into my transition. If I were to be gatekept just because of my autism and fetishes, I'd be miserable and deprived of the medicine I need to be functional (I've tried to detrans, it went terribly.)
tldr: Autistic fetishists can be dysphoric too.
Anonymous No.41044953 [Report]
>>41044676 (OP)
gatekeeping was a humiliation ritual that pretty much insured that delusional sissy boomers and rapehons were the only people who could troon
brianna wu is gatekeeping's strongest soldier, keep that in mind
Emily of 4chan !vOczjEBNSI No.41044959 [Report]
>>41044812
>I’m already fine with you brutalising your own body if it’s at your expense
Then why aren't you supporting over the counter HRT? You seem to be more interested in adding in even more hoops to jump through and barriers to overcome.
Anonymous No.41044974 [Report]
>>41044676 (OP)
>Destroy the image of trans people.
oh sweet summer child. Trans optics in the late 90s were:
1.) hooker
2.) mental patient
3.) shameful kinkster hidden life of closeted gay husband
Anonymous No.41045150 [Report]
Only HSTS should have been allowed to be tops.
Anonymous No.41045172 [Report] >>41045197 >>41045198
>>41044676 (OP)
>autistic trenders/perverted men
those people don't get blocked by medical gatekeeping
medical gatekeeping is always 100% wrong no matter what, anyone should be able to easily buy sex hormones without a prescription.
the problem is that people who are not Actually trans adopting the trans label as a sign of nonconformity or political stance. The idea of transsexuals needs to come back.
Emily of 4chan !vOczjEBNSI No.41045197 [Report]
>>41045172
I don't see that that is actually a problem. And it seems to have died off pretty hard at this point.
Anonymous No.41045198 [Report] >>41045203
>>41045172
I agree with you. I just dont see how else we could keep these people from using the label other than medical gatekeeping?
Anonymous No.41045203 [Report] >>41045223
>>41045198
but medical gatekeeping has nothing to do with the language
anyone at all can claim to be trans, making it harder for people to get hormones changes nothing about that. It just makes the lives of non-trenders worse
Anonymous No.41045223 [Report]
>>41045203
agreed. im just at a lose, I should've said being against self-id than medical gatekeeping. its a really complicated situation
Anonymous No.41045235 [Report]
attention!

a contributor to our bad optics is posting in this thread...

can anyone guess who it is

hint: they mindlessly group together trans issues with other, completely non-related issues..
Anonymous No.41045238 [Report]
if you are debating gatekeeping trannies, or anything for that matter, on 4chan, then you are
>the influx of autistic trenders/perverted men
that you are complaining about
Anonymous No.41045321 [Report]
>>41044676 (OP)
you cannot medically gatekeep someone from putting on a dress and demanding she/her pronouns. amazon basics skirts are not ever going to require a fucking prescription.
you can medically gatekeep someone from taking hrt, with some degree of effectiveness. DIY is of course possible but that requires agency a lot of people don't really have, and governments have tried to prevent it with varying levels of success.
when medical gatekeeping exists, it has generally included RLE requirements that are practically optimized to make people hate trannies, by forcing trans people to be openly trans in potentially hostile environments.

at this point all of this should be obvious, and i have a hard time understanding how people don't see it. if you're worried about optics the informed consent model is your best friend, at least for estrogen.
Anonymous No.41046681 [Report]
>>41044950
you shouldn't have been allowed to troon
Anonymous No.41046702 [Report]
>>41044676 (OP)
It’s too late. The flood gates are open.
Anonymous No.41046719 [Report]
>>41044676 (OP)
I think it would be better if it were more socially acceptable to just be a feminine cis male taking estrogen im sure a lot of fake troons like me would be fine with that
punished umaruchan !!9dCyHba5Iu5 No.41046787 [Report] >>41046828
>>41044676 (OP)
gatekeeping as in any medically diagnostic procedure isn't that bad, most of the issues with it come from the fact that clinics usually run a monopoly in their area
that leads to excessively long waiting lists, humiliation rituals, and a vulnerability to biased research output
if it became part of standard care and the psychopathologization of gender dysphoria was recast as a natural response, then most of the issues would dissolve
Anonymous No.41046828 [Report]
>>41044676 (OP)
Yes, gatekeeping creates MORE autistic hons since they're one of the few groups willing to go through abject humiliation rituals like RLE.
>>41046787
This is a good point, but unreasonable in any form other than an informed consent model, as expecting ALL general practitioners to be able to complete a sexological assessment is unreasonable.