>>41534318
>people are attracted to each other based on their characteristics, not their identities or pronouns
Correct and one such characteristic is your sex assigned at birth, a characteristic that is non-trivial factor in attraction to most people. When trannies assert they are literally female they attempt to mask this characteristic with an identity. The based ladyboy does not hide her sex assigned at birth, she accepts her birth sex AND her femininity at the same time then seeks someone who desires both.
>so they get excluded?
From sex exclusive spaces? Yes, obviously, the point of the ladyboy gender is that the ladyboy is not a female and does not expect to be treated like a female.
>It's not pleasant
Then don't be born in a third world country as a poor person. You are already miles ahead of this existence and accepting a third gender would not turn you into a prostitute. It's not like suddenly gender based discrimination is legal if we have ladyboys around here.
>how come the people who hate trannies the most do so on the basis that trannies AREN'T female
Because trannies assert that they are female and should be treated literally identically as females.
>the first things they do when in power is remove legal recognition of trannies as women?
The ladyboy gender does not seek such legal recognition in the first place
>do you think that would benefit gay rights?
I think the gays won their rights by convincing normies that they were sane and I think trannies could do the same by accepting that they are not literal females. If the tranny movement broadly said "yeah we're ladyboys and that's hella based" the normie mind would bend in their favor away from cuckservative hate the same way the gays did.
But the more trannies assert "we're literally female and if you doubt this even a little bit you are a bigot" normies just go "oh, guess I'm a bigot then".