Anonymous
6/10/2025, 12:49:39 PM No.24456299
The Vedantic confession that only Brahman really is:
Mark 18:10
>And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
The Vedantic confession that self of Christ is the self of Brahman, and that the carnal body is a phantom, illusion, or disguise of Brahman:
John 14:28
>Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
Philippians 2:9
>But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
Romans 8:3
>For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
1 Corinthians 6:19
>What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
2 Corinthians 5:19
>To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
1 Corinthians 15:47
>The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven.
John 2:19
>Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
I have read the books of the Sacra Doctrina series published by the Catholic University of America Press, the texts of the ecumenical councils, Prepare the way of the Lord: an introduction to the Old Testament published by Concordia, The dynamics of biblical parallelism published by Eerdmans, and dozens of other books representing the most recent scholarship on what is today's most popular superstition. My reading of these dozens of books has led me inevitably to a single obvious conclusion that arrogant and superstitious Christians attempt, and fail, to obfuscate.
Christianity is polytheistic.
Boethius defines a person as an individual substance of a rational nature.
Three separate rational persons implies three separate natures.
Three separate natures implies three separate gods.
Dr. Nina E. Livesey reveals that polytheist Marcionites wrote the Pauline epistles:
>To better understand early Christianity, we must look to the social and political circumstances surrounding the rise of Pauline letters in the mid-second century. Such an endeavor resists allowing the letters to create social realities– doing historical work for us– and instead opens explorations into questions of events and factors outside the letters, including those of ancient textual production and deployment. By examining Marcion and his circle, and other contemporaneous second-century writers and writings, we will be better informed of the foundations of early Christianity.
Marcion attributed aseity and eternity to a second god.
Because there is so much evidence even in my brief argument here, I will conclude my argument against the Christian sophists in a reply.
Mark 18:10
>And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
The Vedantic confession that self of Christ is the self of Brahman, and that the carnal body is a phantom, illusion, or disguise of Brahman:
John 14:28
>Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
Philippians 2:9
>But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
Romans 8:3
>For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
1 Corinthians 6:19
>What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
2 Corinthians 5:19
>To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
1 Corinthians 15:47
>The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven.
John 2:19
>Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
I have read the books of the Sacra Doctrina series published by the Catholic University of America Press, the texts of the ecumenical councils, Prepare the way of the Lord: an introduction to the Old Testament published by Concordia, The dynamics of biblical parallelism published by Eerdmans, and dozens of other books representing the most recent scholarship on what is today's most popular superstition. My reading of these dozens of books has led me inevitably to a single obvious conclusion that arrogant and superstitious Christians attempt, and fail, to obfuscate.
Christianity is polytheistic.
Boethius defines a person as an individual substance of a rational nature.
Three separate rational persons implies three separate natures.
Three separate natures implies three separate gods.
Dr. Nina E. Livesey reveals that polytheist Marcionites wrote the Pauline epistles:
>To better understand early Christianity, we must look to the social and political circumstances surrounding the rise of Pauline letters in the mid-second century. Such an endeavor resists allowing the letters to create social realities– doing historical work for us– and instead opens explorations into questions of events and factors outside the letters, including those of ancient textual production and deployment. By examining Marcion and his circle, and other contemporaneous second-century writers and writings, we will be better informed of the foundations of early Christianity.
Marcion attributed aseity and eternity to a second god.
Because there is so much evidence even in my brief argument here, I will conclude my argument against the Christian sophists in a reply.
Replies:
