>>24460942Just finished Suttree. In that novel at least, the entire text is Suttree's interiority, even when the narrator is omniscient. It's he who sees the world in those 'vague biblical statements'.
I didn't quite get at first why he's living the way he does, but now it's obvious that McCarthy tells you almost everything very early on. He's extremely troubled by the thought of his twin's death and the life unlived. He thinks it could've just as easily been him who died, maybe it was and he's the twin, what would be the difference?
Suttree believes in transcendentalism. He says outright that "one man is every man." In a sense he's looking for himself in other people, and he's anguished because the lives of the common people of his hometown and childhood neighbourhood are ruinous and degenerate. So he's for meaning in them to explain the death of his twin, and he's finding more degeneration and death.
At the end, after he's turned to shamanistic rituals to try and understand something, and then almost dies from typhoid fever and has an extended near death experience rife with dream-logic symbolism, he decides to leave Knoxville and leave his past behind.
While he's hitchhiking and waiting for the first car to stop he sees construction workers being brought water by a blond boy who brings some to Suttree because he happens to be standing nearby. He notices this boy's blond hair and blue eyes and describes him as a mirror of himself (his twin). Then a car has stopped without him noticing.
As it starts moving he looks back and sees a hound dog sniffing at the place where he was just standing. The last paragraph is omniscient but it's still Suttree's mind because it's a continuation of his internal monologue. It says there's a hunter everywhere in the world with a pack of hounds that are ravenous for human souls, and he thinks "let them fly" because he's resolved his existentialist dilemma.