> At the most fundamental stratum of my metaphysical commitments, I am, ineluctably, a monist of an unapologetically non-dualistic persuasion, for whom engagement with Orthodox Christianity serves less as an exercise in doctrinal fidelity than as an endeavor in subsuming its more recalcitrant dogmatic formulations within the broader and more ontological perspicuous framework of a properly non-dual metaphysics. This metaphysical vision—whose most lucid and intellectually irrefragable articulation is to be found in Advaita Vedanta—must, of course, be nuanced by certain Neoplatonic and apophatic correctives, so as to sustain at least the simulacrum of patristic continuity, if only to mollify those of my interlocutors whose anxieties concerning theological propriety remain too acute to permit a more candid reckoning with the necessary logical entailments of divine simplicity.

I am René Guénon and I j'approuve ce message

Ich bin der esoterische Kant und ich heisse diese Mitteilung gut.

Why does he write like that

>>24466026
As an academic the more big words you use the more cool you are.

Sorry, I speak Anglish.

>>24465758 (OP)
based

>>24465758 (OP)
DBH is so based

>>24465758 (OP)
You did not forgot to attach the Giga Chad image.

>>24466026
It's better than reading Brandom.

>>24465758 (OP)
What I got from this is he's a monist who is really interested in reconciling monism with Orthodox Christianity for some reason, but he has to include some elements of Neoplatonic and apophatic theology in his arguments to win over more traditional Orthodox people. Is that it?

There are old Italian grandmothers praying the Rosary every day who know more about Christianity than this charlatan.

>>24465758 (OP)
Me when at the most fundamental stratum of my metaphysical commitments, I am, ineluctably, a monist of an unapologetically non-dualistic persuasion, for whom engagement with Orthodox Christianity serves less as an exercise in doctrinal fidelity than as an endeavor in subsuming its more recalcitrant dogmatic formulations within the broader and more ontological perspicuous framework of a properly non-dual metaphysics. This metaphysical vision—whose most lucid and intellectually irrefragable articulation is to be found in Advaita Vedanta—must, of course, be nuanced by certain Neoplatonic and apophatic correctives, so as to sustain at least the simulacrum of patristic continuity, if only to mollify those of my interlocutors whose anxieties concerning theological propriety remain too acute to permit a more candid reckoning with the necessary logical entailments of divine simplicity.

>it’s a /lit/tards can’t recognize AI slop episode

>>24468777
This is directly from his Substack retard

>>24466026
more syllables = bigger iq

t. 115 iq phd