>>24470504His philosophy is akin to that of a monkey amalgamated with a tick, yet unlike either of these two animals he'll never punch above his weight. Bullying those weaker than him from under the skirt of his bodyguards is his limit. Leeching from gullibles without reinvesting into anything of lasting value puts his net contributions in the negatives. He'll never produce a single novel concept or an engineering marvel. He'll never contribute to the advancement of humanity.
>but he can beat you upA big enough monkey also can, and so can it beat him as well. That is, unless he's going to cry out for his bodyguards the same way "the last men" would call the cops.
That also wouldn't change the fact that 2+2=4. Everything he uses in his daily life to grift and flaunt his wealth involves technology that states: 2+2=4.
Let's say that he has a way to intimidate every worker in a production line for his Bugattis to use 2+2=5 in their calculations. He would never do that, because the result will prove his folly, and him never doing so while having the means would equal to his acceptance of his powerlessness in front of hard reality. Otherwise he can resort to gouging the eyes of the observers in a tantrum so they couldn't witness, yet the resulting clump of plastic and metal wouldn't budge.
People like him are useless for humanity. If we compare it to a body then his ilk will constitute either a bodily refuse or a malignant tumor. The age of modern communications produces nutritious opportunities for humankind's growth and development, but also cancerous growths and a poisonous waste matter that takes effort and resources to process and expel. Eventually the influence of tates will be optimized out of societies.