I've never met a woman interesting in metaphysics. But to tell you the truth, it's been a long time since I've talked to a woman who isn't related to me.

women don't think

>>24471918 (OP)
>it's been a long time since I've talked to a woman who isn't related to me
Why

>>24471918 (OP)
A had a teacher on college who was a metaphysics teacher. She was actually very chud female tier. I had a lot of fun in her classes because instead of she talking about metaphysics she was much more concerned about about how the west had fallen.

>>24471918 (OP)
It's not even worth thinking about. 99% of people have no value anyway, why should anyone care if most of them don't have intellectual value?

this board is filled with children.

>>24471947
neet life

>>24471976
problem?

>>24471942
So you proved OP's point.
>>24471918 (OP)
Anon, they fail to take interest in things that are even relatively more grounded. I've met theoretical physics professors (female) who kept this boastful appearance of genuine expertise, but the moment you start talking to them and try to get the dialogue going, they run off into their kennel and start barking at you. They are extremely funny people in a rather pitiful way due to this. It's extremely easy to shatter their facade if you're in the know.

The life of a woman is performative. She has to appear good to society, to her female peers, to her husband, to her parents, to her children, etc etc. They are so sucked into the world of externals that they spend no time internalizing anything. They just idly exist. A woman is the ontological nothing.

That's why they're so enigmatic at first sight. To understand a vacuous predicate is sometimes the trickiest part of a proof, but it is more often than not pointless and reveals absolutely nothing. A mere obstacle, an annoyance. A shit test if you will.

I have stopped making eye contact or communicating with women outside of professional duties. If a woman was interested in metaphysics and you starved her of attention so she wouldn't get any feedback on her "interest" would she maintain such an interest? What about /lit/ users generally? If they didn't get feedback on their "interest" in metaphysics, would they maintain interest. I would bet 70-30 and 90-10 on "no" respectively. /lit/ users are generally even more synthetic than the average woman.

>>24471931
/thread
>>24471947
indeed
>>24471953
i dont think there are many women who browse here, no

>>24471947
>It's not even worth thinking about.
exactly what i was thinking

women are like the men who watch sports. try having a conversation about metaphysics with a person like that. you will quickly find out how different you are and how it's impossible. they will make fun of you for it and think you are weak and boring.

>>24471918 (OP)
>I've never met a woman interesting in metaphysics.
anon, 99.99% of men don't give a fuck what your thoughts are about metaphysics either.

believe it or not, most people don't really care at all about philosophical wankery and live lives more materialistic than you

don't take that as an excuse to feel superior. you're not better than them either.

if you want to do metaphysics, go to university and go into the philosophy program. you'll meet plenty of women there who want to talk philosophy.

>>24472219
a man born from generations of men who cherish and value women and have wonderful families, and he decides to end his bloodline forever so he can be a hateful misogynist

>>24472456
this. /lit/fags don't interact with anybody outside of this board but the deepest thing the average man knows is their favorite porn star's vaginal depth

>>24472456
>generations of men who cherish and value women and have wonderful families
have you looked around you and of course the world in the last decades? the more freedom women are given, the worse the outcome for everyone is, lmao

>>24471918 (OP)
Yes, I have recently had an intellectual conversation with a couple of quasi-art hoe women in the and they are significantly more thoughtful and philosophical than you might think. However this may only apply to women who are on birth control and are not in a constant state of disarray from being thrown from one extreme hormonal emotional state to another.

>>24472486
Bad end

They simple can't do it without drugs

>>24472475
This is why India will become the next superpower

>>24472499
can you do it without drugs?

>>24472517
>finished college
>still end up being an unemployed/underemployed loser

>>24472499
Women who learn copium skills with their shit malfunctioning every month are stronger than women who take birth control.

women are capable of abstract thought; it's just that abstract thoughts SUCK

>>24471918 (OP)
If we thinks like Kantians here, then we have to consider what kind of thinking it required for metaphysics, which is a matter of capacity, so really it’s a practical question (in the sense that we’re talking about the will). What distinguishes man from beast is man’s self-legislative capacity due to his rational faculty, meaning that he can ignore or put off the drive of desire/inclination. Inclination is oriented toward satisfaction of the individual, man as an existent particular entity. However, due to the rational faculty, one can have actions that go totally against inclination (a deed of pure duty and absolute moral worth). Due to the constant pangs of their biological condition, dramatic hormonal functions, maternal drives, etc. their will is more heterogenous, meaning it’s determined by objects outside, so to speak. The purely autonomous will wills what it wills purely from its own nature, thus this abstractive capacity can elevate one to rational cognition. The will of a woman is much more naturally bound, thus her use of the rational faculty is inhibited, in much the same way that a drugs addict or retard might be.

>>24472594
begone materialist!

they do, but only when no chud is spending money simping on her and they have to spend some time thinking of how to earn a living, thinking for them is like wearing a hat, they have the luxury to remove the hat and blame you into spending money on them if the hat becomes unfashionable

They do, but only when no chud is spending money simping on her then they have to spend some time thinking of how to earn a living, thinking for them is like wearing a hat, they have the luxury to remove the hat and blame you into spending money on them if the hat becomes unfashionable.

>>24472544
A hobo is stronger than a wagie

>>24471918 (OP)
Yes they are.

>>24471918 (OP)
Metaphysics and similar contemplative pursuits are exclusively the venture of neurotic incels. Since women do not suffer from inceldom, they have no incentive to cope with pseudointellectual exercises like that.

>>24471918 (OP)
no, foids never had to do anything other than exist for their bloodline to continue, they have no biological ability to think independently or reason further than muh vagina

i like going to university faculty pages and looking for attractive women
also if you look up lecture channels by universities the attractive women speakers usually have the most views

i tried getting into metaphysics but i had a hard time understanding it