Atheists are the biggest shitposting trolls on this board. Why are they even here when they won't even attempt a reasonable discussion? They won't even pretend to make a reasonable discussion. Why even use a discussion board when you clearly just want an echo chamber?

Even if you try to make a logical argument with them, they won't make a logical argument in return or even try to refute your logical arguments, they'll just shit all over the floor and call you a troll for refusing to entertain their diaper baby tantrums. Even if you handle them with the softest kid gloves in the world, they'll still shit up the thread and board, and typically start spamming garbage threads as "retaliation" as they've repeatedly and openly admitted they do on /his/. They never make any effort posts or quality posts, it's always the lowest quality garbage troll posts, even lower quality than /b/ or /s4s/ or literally any board's worst posters. They're doing to /lit/ what they've already done to /his/; that is, throw tantrums and shit up the entire place whenever they're not given a safe space echo chamber; as if this is r/atheism for their retarded little circle jerks of logical fallacies, ad hominem, and baby tantrums.

Are there any books which explore or expose this phenomenon? And it's not like their leading "intellectuals" or debaters are really any different, they do all of the exact same childish bullshit and exact same dishonest and disingenuous garbage of not even attempting to reply to anyone's logical arguments. The only difference is the leading "atheist intellectuals" are just better at masking it and appearing to have made a logical argument, when really it's typically just slander, lies, misrepresentation or strawmen, and personal attacks or ad hominem.

What books can /lit/ recommend for me to understand this subhuman, baby tantrum atheist mindset of the many faggot atheist trolls who the fag mods refuse to ban for spamming troll posts of /b/ and never making quality posts with logical or reasonable arguments for their beliefs?

>>24476843 (OP)
>Even if you try to make a logical argument with them
Why don't we start with the fact an argument isn't justified because it's logical

>>24476843 (OP)
>and never making quality posts with logical or reasonable arguments for their beliefs?
They're incapable of doing that, I don't know why. Their only reply is to lash out at other beliefs and other religions (read: only Christianity), but they can't just on their own merit and the merit of their own beliefs explain why they "know" there is no God and all the rest of their beliefs they have on faith that stem from that. They can't even explain why you're wrong to say they'd have to be omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient (or, a God of their own) to know such a thing as there being no God.

This post is a perfect example of why we actually need the -oy-ak posters and cue ay guys. Ideally, there would be fifteen different replies in this thread with the OP put in green text and accompanied by a grotesque bald glasses man drawing.

>>24476851
its the same the other way around thoughever. explain why you know theres a god. atheists dont try to make up random shit to explain holes in their knowledge. they just accept the fact that we dont know some things. yes theres some retarded atheists that say dumb shit but the same goes for christianity or any group of people.

>>24476843 (OP)
>Books about (four paragraph off topic rant that no one cares about)
You clearly don't want to talk about books: you just want to complain about people you don't like.

I too believe that desert jews can do all kinds of magical tricks, like walk on water

>>24476843 (OP)
I'm an atheist, but I like Christianity from the cultural point of view: you can't understand Europe and the Middle Ages without understanding Christianity, for example. So I'm a peaceful atheist. I don't believe in God because
1) I know something about history and history of religion in particular, so I know how religions spreaded, historical and social processes behind it.
2) I'm a STEM bro, so it has its influence too (through astronomy and cosmology, for example).

>>24476843 (OP)
Hogg (1969), by Samuel Delaney

>>24476845
>>24476860
>>24476867
>>24476869
>>24476894
You didn't post a book recommendation. All you cancerous shitposting atheist trolls are doing is proving the phenomenon I'm asking to understand through a book recommendation to be true 100% of the time every single day.

Read the sticky and get the fuck out of /lit/, cancer.

>>24476845
Just straight from the outset, not even pretending to be logical or rational. Kill yourself, cancer reddit tourist newfag.

>>24476867
If atheists accepted they couldn't know things, they wouldn't affirmatively go around claiming they know there is no God. You fucking retards are illiterate and how many times do I have to make the argument for you subhuman trash "people" to read it?

>>24476869
Pure projection, shitposting atheist troll.

>>24476871
Go back to r/atheism, cancer reddit tourist newfag.

>>24476894
>I'm an atheist
>I don't believe in God because
Nobody asked. Learn to read.

>>24477284
>"Hogg is a novel by American author Samuel R. Delany, written in 1969 and completed in 1995. The novel deals graphically with themes of murder, child molestation, incest, coprophilia, coprophagia, urolagnia, anal-oral contact, necrophilia and rape."
>"The plot features a silent pre-adolescent boy (called only "cocksucker") sold into sexual slavery to a rapist named "Hogg" Hargus, who exposes him to the most extreme acts of deviancy imaginable."
How is this going to help me understand these subhuman atheist dogs? I'm not looking for sodomite smut/porn books, the equivalent of "romance novels" but for fag sodomites.

>>24477325
>You didn't post a book recommendation
Bart D. Ehrman's bibliography.

>>24476843 (OP)

>4 paragraphs of literal cope

Will reading this make God any more real? I hope not. Not gonna try anyway

>>24476843 (OP)
>Are there any books which explore or expose this phenomenon?
The Bible; ironically. Romans 1, among others.

>>24476867
>atheists dont try to make up random shit to explain holes in their knowledge
saying "nature did done everything" is exactly that THOUGH

>>24476843 (OP)
Read The God Delusion

Reverend Insanity.

>>24477529

>>24476843 (OP)
Why is /lit/ being spammed so much by christgolems threads as of lately? Is it a new psyop because of the upcoming american draft for the war in Iran? Anyway, that's not literature related, go the fuck back to /his/ or, better, /trash/.

>>24477635
It's actually a disgrace, spammers just put "books about ____" and then mods don't purge the threads that are clearly off topic. Just embarrassing.

>>24477497
>>24477611
>>24477635
>>24477653
See >>24477325

You are the cancer killing /lit/. Go back to /lgbt/ and r/atheism.

>>24476860
>what's that? someone's not giving me a safe space echo chamber for faggot atheism
>waaah this thread needs to be spammed by soi sharty pedophiles because I'm so heckin offended
The eternal atheist.

>>24477520
Yeah, but I want something more specific to just atheists and their bullshit antics. Surely someone has written about this phenomenon that these faggot atheist pedophiles and trannies are so upset about being called out for.

>>24477462
Some closeted homo's fedora tipping and ramblings really isn't relevant to this phenomenon I'm describing and seeking to understand through literature.

>>24477626
>"Reverend Insanity" by Gu Zhen Ren is a popular Chinese web novel set in a complex and immersive Xianxia world. The story follows Fang Yuan, a cunning and ruthless protagonist who is reincarnated 500 years into his past with all his previous life’s memories and experiences intact. Fang Yuan’s primary goal is to achieve immortality, and he is willing to go to any lengths, including betrayal and murder, to reach his objectives.
How is that relevant?

if god can print fuck you money why don't you even need any?

>>24477462
Also, Bart Ehrman is one of those retards who go around trying to tell people that the Bible doesn't say what the Bible plainly says; only retarded gaytheists would believe that gay jew's lies and bullshit further proving that atheists are just golems of the jews.

>>24477703
Fix your bot, retarded ESL monkey.

>>24476843 (OP)
Christians and atheists are equally stupid and wrong. The endless arguments you have are boring; nothing was ever gained from them, and nothing will be.

>>24477684
>What books can /lit/ recommend for me to understand this subhuman, baby tantrum atheist mindset of the many faggot atheist trolls who the fag mods refuse to ban for spamming troll posts of /b/ and never making quality posts with logical or reasonable arguments for their beliefs?
No one is buying your disingenuous bullshit

>>24477332
>>24477529
like i said theres the vocal retard group. im by definition an atheist yet i dont claim to know shit i dont. you guys need to learn that one person in a group doesnt represent everyone in that group.

>>24476843 (OP)
You don't have logical arguments, just arguments to authority. And yet you expect the other side to humor you with theirs.