Just found out I have an IQ of 105 from an online test...
Welp, time to quit reading as a hobby. Was nice knowing you guys.
On a sidenote, any literature for someone of my intelligence/predicament?

>>24476889 (OP)
Atomic Habits
Can‘t Hurt Me
12 Rules for Life
48 Laws of Power

(and Dostoevsky)

If IQ wasn't one test but a 1 year program where you have to do all sorts of certain things different kinds of people would be considered smart. Smart people would still be smart.

>>24476889 (OP)
There can be huge differences in g, spatial, and verbal, among all of the many other domains, verbal can be increased just by reading complicated material. Theres people with 160 verbal iq and 70 spatial iq

>>24476933
riddled with typos btw

>>24476893
Dostoevsky is lauded by Jordan Peterson though

>>24476889 (OP)
>an online test...
you're so gullible

>>24476893
Dostoevsky bros... we lost...

>>24476889 (OP)
My IQ is 107 but the verbal portion is 150s and the math portion is 60s. Also I actually did an in person test.

>>24476933
Yes, I actually am one of those because my brain is severely impaired. I could only manage 3 of the math questions before it became too much.

>>24476933
In the Cartesius book I own, I managed Discourse, Rules for direction and Meditations just fine but when I got to Geometry I didn't understand a single piece of it and it was like trying to decipher an alien language.

>>24476889 (OP)
Remember that online tests aren't accurate and they inflate your score to make you want to take more online IQ tests.

>>24478371
An actual IQ test would score different areas (math, verbal, general knowledge) and then your score is a composite of those numbers. Be wary of any test which isn't like that.

>>24478305
Lel what's the hardest text you're able to comprehend? I assumed complex reading shouldn't be possible with a quantitative capacity bordering on retardation. No offense, I'm just very curious how this works. What's considered an easy quantitative problem or operation that you struggle with?

>>24478391
This post >>24478321 is a good example of my reading habits. The philosophical portion of Descartes' work was easy but Geometry was incomprehensible. Rote numbers and addition are beyond me but anything else like poets or novels are fine.

>>24478391
I am the poster Jon Kolner btw. You can just search in archive which books I discuss.

>>24476889 (OP)
>Just found out I have an IQ of 105

I've got an IQ of 93; reading is the only thing that keeps my brain from completely atrophying.

>>24478391
It has been nearly half a decade since my test and I may be messing up the numbers but my full "stats" are something like Verbal 150s, general knowledge/ random facts 150s, puzzle solving/ spatial 110s, math 60s

>>24478305
John has 7 apples. He eats one and then gives three to Sally. How many apples does John have left?

>>24478428
He would have three. That took me like 20 seconds to figure though.

>>24478430
John has a box of 37 apples. He eats one and splits the remainder evenly between himself and five friends. How many apples does each of them have?

>>24478434
They would have seven each with one left over.

>>24476889 (OP)
The Hungry Caterpillar but I think that might be a bit too advanced for you to comprehend.

>>24478437
How are you going to make a claim like 150 verbal IQ and 60 math IQ and then go on to do the math correctly but fail the reading comprehension part of the problem?