>>24485221You are totally off the mark and I confess im also having a hard time grasping my way around what you just said
>>24479772>valueless if it doesn't inform your future actions. this plays with semantics in an odd way but the point is that it illustrates well how if you keep reading books like that loser in OP's pic your own perspective of yourself or literature turns into a powerpoint slideshow. How do you interpret this as not reading for the sake of reading? are you sure you agree that reading for reading's sake means reading 18 hours a day? reading and deeply enjoying an important book at an important time, so lets imagine a transformative experience, can often lead you to put down the book and immediately be aware of how the world has changed. That is part of what reading for the sake of reading is; you interact with art, you get inspired, and then you do things, out there, in the world. It doesn't directly 'inform', but it does guide your following actions.
Now by the way you replied it is quite clear that you would rather idealize the idea of grinding 18 hours a day so here i ask you to look again at
>valueless if it doesnt inform your future actions isnt the way you treat books under the preestablished governance of your system and your approach to books that tells you that once you finish reading this book you put it on your goodreads and then you tweet about it?
but perhaps you would instead listen to the firelink shrine ost in ds3 while reading Yvain and then when you re done with it you climb up the ladder and place it on the medium to highest shelf in your scriptorium and you forget that you start interacting with knowledge only after you kick down the ladder.