>>24481555>navigates both the individual & group boundaries of various competing willsnow this would impressive!
instead Stirner's best is being a contrarian to wills and assuming that his will (ego) would emerge de facto; while in reality you just become slave to your bodily passions at the expense of your noetic and spiritual capacities (you might ignore other egos, but they don't ignore you).
at worse, you exist as a stochastic will of whimsy with no real coherent & contingent worldview. every choice a coin flip.
it's budget solipsism.