Start with the Groks.

>>24487259 (OP)
so what was the black eye all about

>>24487439
the black eye is an initiation rite to the synagogue of Satan. All pedophiles, friends of Jeffrey Epstein, and enemies of Christ get one and have to publicly display it as a humiliation ritual.

>>24487452
Except it was on the other eye. And most celebrities who showed they had a black eye were old and thus easy to bruise

>>24487259 (OP)
Nazis tried to rewrite history too.

>>24487460
Many of them weren't that old. Not that anon, but why are you trying to cover for mystery religion freemasons and the synagogue of satan? He didn't even specify which eye, yet you say "it was the other eye".

>>24487520
>implying there are any reliable history books still being published on the market today
>implying only "le heckin ebil nazis" rewrote history
I bet you'll chimp out if I tell you the nazis were socialists too.

>>24487259 (OP)
this is a good idea finally knowledge without human bias or propaganda

>>24487538
Then, pray tell, who rewrote the books that are on the market?

>>24487549
Probably mostly the Jesuits through all the Jesuit publishers, chances are you have no idea of their involvement in fomenting the world wars or American civil war and chances are you never heard word one about the inquisitions in your history classes from your history textbooks, or they just glossed over all the important details and generalized it. And chances are you don't get any true banking history in your history textbooks either since they're all connected (I'd post the pic, but I don't have it, with all the rest of the secret societies and cults).

Who do you think went around for centuries burning all the books they didn't like? The Catholic cult and her Jesuits. They would've burned all the Bibles off the face of the earth if they could too.

>but some literal who wrote a history book you can buy on Amazon
Okay retard. Live in denial of the fact that history changes every single generation whenever it doesn't suit someone's agenda. I bet you think the Federal Reserve Bank is actually federal too, with how much of a shit-eating snarky reddit-tier reply you gave me, I bet you'll be offended on behalf of "historians" by all this too.

>>24487569
>fomenting the world wars
Go on then, elaborate what is so wrong with the "official narrative" there.

Guénon (PBUH) was so right it is truly terrifying

>>24487777
Qabbalistick Quads

>>24487777
PBVH

>>24487536
I said the other eye because it was. You should know that. And I'm not defending it I'm pointing at the retardation of people like (You) who are basically covering for them by sperging out over every tiny unrelated things

>>24487259 (OP)
>we will train our AI on its own output
Musk is so fucking stupid. Why does he pretend to have any involvement in the design of any of his technologies?

>>24487895
to be fair NVIDIA is pushing this too. they have an idea that in addition to 'real' data from 'reality' every object in reality should have a simulated synthetic version of itself to produce way more training data. you might argue that this might produce runaway systems that reflect arbitrarily generated data rather than reality. like it sounds like cancer. like it sounds like bootstrapping simulacra to be more important and powerful than reality. its just ai things

>>24487895
>>24487925
Why would AI produced data be more accurate when the AI producing the data is trained on human data lmao? Why not just train it on academic literature or books or stuff that's more high quality than blogposts

>>24487925
digital twinning just makes it so you can use machine learning to run simulations on and optimize your supply chain down to where shit is stored in the warehouse to how it is packed on trucks etc.

>>24488060
well they trained on everything real, they are out of that stuff and need to start generating more, faster than reality generates it

>>24488066
thank you! I was searching for that term. when i heard it I was like what the FUCK

>>24488068
That isnt how it fucking works. The output just degenerates if you attenpt to train it on itself. LLMs do not generate new data, they’re just spitting out what it read but with less detail and coherence.

>>24488060
>academic literature or books
But then the bot turns out racist, sexist, etc. and that's problematic.

>>24488100
well it worked in chess and go maybe it will work here as well

>>24487895
He phrased it to sound cool to the plebs. It's just pruning the data, everybody does that to train LLMs. If you did ctrl-A on this thread, you'd get a bunch of dates, post numbers, typos, incomplete sentences, PBVH and so on. If you train on that you'd also get that gibberish out. So why not just use an LLM to get rid of all the trash.

>>24488216
Chess is obviously not the same. Jesus christ.
>>24488296
That is not what he said. He literally said it would “add missing information.” Why do you feel the need to cope on behalf of this moron

>>24487569
Jesuit and Catholic fear mongering is like 50s and 70s material at best so either you’re old as shit or you’re stuck on the oldies station for conspiracies. Day of the pillow soon boomer.

>>24487777
Checked and trve

>>24488100
This. It leads to over-fitting and nonsense. It's AI getting high on its own supply.

>>24488216
It worked in chess because there's a clearly defined win condition in chess. The ai can be rewarded or punished based on how it wins. With text generation the AI is rewarded based on how close its answer to the prompt is to the given text (I believe). So training it on itself doesn't make sense.