>>24491338Guenon wasn't writing for the sake of pleasant prose in the slightest, he viewed himself as a pure expositor of metaphysics. He was also extremely autistic about laying out all the parameters of the language and word choices he was using, both to ensure he was already controlling the field of argument, and to ensure that there was as little chance as possible for "modern misconceptions" to lead to him being misunderstood. I still like him quite a bit, but he is the absolute king of run on sentences and tends to rehash shit he's already gone over a lot. You might prefer Coomarawamy (comfier, less of a stick up his ass, my personal fav) or Evola (much more impassioned in his writing), both of them do better in regards to actually being fun to read, RG is very dry