Septuagint + Greek NT - /lit/ (#24492413) [Archived: 709 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/24/2025, 2:49:46 PM No.24492413
IMG_2574
IMG_2574
md5: 22b21bc23f044b600b3ee75e726ebb65🔍
Is it possible to get the Greek Septuagint and New Testament in one book? Not in modern Greek but in Koiné Greek.
Would the Greek Orthodox Church publish such a thing?
Replies: >>24492420 >>24492437 >>24493580 >>24493902 >>24494229 >>24497403
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 2:55:26 PM No.24492416
No. There's no such thing as a singular Septuagint just like there's no singular New Testament Greek text. Both would be critical texts compiled by scholars and would be published as their own work with apparatus.
Replies: >>24492419 >>24492443
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 2:57:59 PM No.24492419
>>24492416
Well, is there that?
Replies: >>24492430 >>24492435
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 2:59:08 PM No.24492420
>>24492413 (OP)
How much does the exegesis between the Septuagint and Masoretic texts differ? Is it noticeable?
Replies: >>24492937 >>24493902
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 3:03:47 PM No.24492430
>>24492419
>NT
Nestle-Aland Novum Testament Graece
>OT
Rahlfs-Hanhart Septuaginta
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 3:04:48 PM No.24492435
>>24492419
>NT
Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece
>OT
Rahlfs-Hanhart Septuaginta
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 3:07:40 PM No.24492437
>>24492413 (OP)
I remember looking a while ago and they do exist but have to be shipped from Greece so they’re pretty expensive and idk about the quality since there are no previews
Look up η αγια γραφη it has a black cover and the ancient accent marks
Replies: >>24493898
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 3:08:52 PM No.24492443
>>24492416
The Greek Orthodox church has its own text which I trust more than ones put together by Anglo/German Protestantoids
Replies: >>24492445
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 3:10:46 PM No.24492445
>>24492443
That is, put it to simply, just their opinion (and only applies to the NT as far as I'm aware). There's no such thing as "Septuagint", the idea of some singular translation being put together by the Jews is a legend, nothing more. There are varying translations of the OT into Greek by different people at different times, which each have their own variable transmissions streams and textual problems.
Replies: >>24492455 >>24494472
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 3:10:52 PM No.24492446
2025-06-24-150927_1457x878_scrot
2025-06-24-150927_1457x878_scrot
md5: 7b3f8714cbc3ddeb82bc6ec29dffb82e🔍
I have a super bare-bones pdf with old and new but I have no idea where I got it from, doesn't look like it would have a physical edition though
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 3:15:49 PM No.24492455
>>24492445
There’s a Byzantine text for the OT just like the New that’s remarkably uniform. Just like non Byzantine texts for the NT anything else is schizo gnostic/heretic garbage that should be ignored
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 7:34:46 PM No.24492937
>>24492420
Well, Masoretic texts are after 0 AD
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 10:57:57 PM No.24493580
>>24492413 (OP)
best I could do OP, hope it helps:

Origen Hexapla (1875)
by Field, Frederick
https://archive.org/details/origenhexapla01unknuoft/mode/2up

The New Testament In The Original Greek Byzantine Textform [By, Maurice A. Robinson & William G. Pierpont] [© 2005]
by Maurice A. Robinson & William G. Pierpont
https://archive.org/details/RP2005KoineGreekNTinByzantineTextform

The New Testament in the original Greek (quick Google search said this ed. IS Koiné Greek)
by Westcott, Brooke Foss, 1825-1901; Hort, Fenton John Anthony, 1828-1892
Publication date 1882
https://archive.org/details/newtestamentino00west/mode/2up
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 12:58:07 AM No.24493898
>>24492437
Any more details on this?
Replies: >>24493957
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 1:00:17 AM No.24493902
>>24492413 (OP)
Get Brenton's.

>>24492420
Masoretics come from the 9th century and they tried to write out clues pointing to Jesus so yeah they're pretty noticeable.
Replies: >>24494472
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 1:33:54 AM No.24493957
>>24493898
https://www.evripidis.gr/product/265793/i-agia-grafi-arxaia-ellinika-/
“ Όλη η Αγία Γραφή -Παλαιά και Καινή Διαθήκη- σε έναν τόμο. Περιλαμβάνεται μόνο το πρωτότυπο κείμενο.”
published by them: https://orthodoxwiki.org/Brotherhood_of_Theologians_Zoe
No apparatus criticus.
Replies: >>24494076
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 2:29:33 AM No.24494076
>>24493957
There’s only one type of diacritic (mark above the vowel). Are you sure it’s Ancient Greek?
Replies: >>24494087
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 2:35:40 AM No.24494087
>>24494076
There’s the rough breathing mark on η, the acute on ι, and the grave on the last η
It also says (ΑΡΧΑΙΑ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ) which means ancient Greek
Replies: >>24494092 >>24495170
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 2:37:27 AM No.24494092
>>24494087
Oh wait the γραφη one is acute too. But that’s still two, modern Greek doesn’t have the rough breathing mark
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 4:08:04 AM No.24494229
>>24492413 (OP)
>Greek Septuagint
Why would you want that trash translation?
Replies: >>24494251
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 4:24:05 AM No.24494251
>>24494229
It's the original.
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 5:59:06 AM No.24494472
BibleKJV
BibleKJV
md5: 5d23902a7f4f15e37295272a56e48a57🔍
>>24492445
There was probably a translation of the first five or six books of Moses into Greek made in the 3rd century BC. Later, others translated other pieces of the Old Testament into Greek due to it being an important language, and eventually Origen compiled these translations in the 3rd century AD, while adding more edits of his own, into what we now call the Septuagint (as part of the Hexapla, which also had other versions of the Old Testament placed next to it).

This "Hexaplar Septuagint" of Origen in the 3rd century AD is generally the basis for what people now call the Septuagint, but they mistakenly think or assume that the oldest 3rd century BC translation (which we do not have anymore) corresponds to what Origen eventually pieced together in the 3rd century AD. They also popularly assume that Origen didn't change anything in his recension of the Septuagint when scholars have shown he certainly did. He likely harmonized various passages to match up with New Testament language, and this only further creates the illusion or popular misconception that the New Testament writers had used it.

>>24493902
>Masoretics come from the 9th century and they tried to write out clues pointing to Jesus so yeah they're pretty noticeable.
I've done comparisons between the Hebrew and Greek forms of the Old Testament, and I can only find places where prophecies about Jesus are removed in the Greek version, not the other way around.

For example, compare Isaiah 9:6, Hosea 11:1 (which is quoted by Matthew 2:15 out of the Hebrew version, not the Greek version) Zechariah 12:10, and Psalm 2:12. Another messianic prophecy referring to Christ is found in Jeremiah 33:15, which is a verse that is removed entirely by the Septuagint.

In fact, the Septuagint form of Jeremiah is missing about 1/8 of the book or 2700 words which are simply not there compared to the older Hebrew version. Jeremiah 33:14-26 for example, a passage of thirteen verses, is missing from the Septuagint.

In other books, the Septuagint Old Testament is missing 31 entire verses from the book of Proverbs by my count, 39 whole verses in 1 Samuel, 49 whole verses in 1 Kings, and 56 whole verses in Exodus, and more. Then there are the messianic prophecies which are changed in the Septuagint to no longer point to Christ, such as Zechariah 12:10 ("they shall look upon me whom they have pierced"), Isaiah 9:6 or Haggai 2:7. You can compare these verses easily by putting the KJV next to the Brenton English translation of the Septuagint for example, or the OSB 2008 translation of the Septuagint.

Also, the Septuagint text has Methuselah live a full 14 years after the flood of Noah, due to differences in some of the ages (see Genesis 5:25, 28). In the Hebrew version, Methuselah died the same year that the flood happened.

It seems to me like those extolling the Septuagint are often not aware of these basic facts, and I don't know of examples where the Hebrew text used by the KJV has such problems.
Replies: >>24494479 >>24499048
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 6:01:18 AM No.24494479
>>24494472
Greek has more aura than Hebrew so the LXX is better
Replies: >>24496553
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 2:35:42 PM No.24495170
IMG_2576
IMG_2576
md5: 8e02a0cf0d2c7e8089477c580c55b905🔍
>>24494087
All I can see are acute accents.
Replies: >>24495557
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 5:56:49 PM No.24495557
>>24495170
That’s the description of the book in modern greek on the site but the book is in ancient, look at the cover
Replies: >>24496565
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 2:18:40 AM No.24496553
136424688638
136424688638
md5: c3a96f9d2878184f0137f74f053fa06e🔍
>>24494479
Replies: >>24497218
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 2:24:48 AM No.24496565
>>24495557
Do you think it’ll ship to Australia?
Replies: >>24498127
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 9:37:42 AM No.24497218
>>24496553
>pic
Thou blasphemest.
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 11:47:56 AM No.24497363
It's called an interlinearGreek/English New Testament.. that's the time you should be searching for OP
Replies: >>24497366
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 11:48:57 AM No.24497366
>>24497363
Term bit time all right I'm phone posting UK you can figure it out s***
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 12:27:10 PM No.24497403
>>24492413 (OP)
I'm unaware of such a text and I don't think there's any incentive to bundle them. They are two different texts, with a different textual tradition and different critical editions. It would be similar to compressing Hesiod's Theogony and the Iliad together. Why won't you get a copy of each? I also fear that such an edition could be careless when it comes to the text they choose to print. At least with two copies you can select the best text of each.
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 7:15:53 PM No.24498127
>>24496565
Idk try to buy it and find out
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 11:45:50 PM No.24498805
This fits the bill, OP. OT from the Septuagint (LXX), NT from the Textus Receptus, Koine and English, with Strong's Concordance.

The Complete Koine-English Reference Bible: New Testament, Septuagint and Strong's Concordance, 2014, Joshua Dickey
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/20817823-the-complete-koine-english-reference-bible
https://annas-archive.org/md5/192b5aec874a1c347ae91f0b6d0c3457
Replies: >>24499313
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 1:11:40 AM No.24499048
>>24494472
You focus on the few verses where the case can be made that the Masoretic Text is more in line with Christ's fulfillment of messianic prophecy compared to the Septuagint while ignoring the literally hundreds of verses which show the exact opposite of what you're arguing. This is the problem with being a dirty protestant: you selectively pick and choose what you want and ignore the rest, and because of this you come to a retarded conclusion.

>and I can only find places where prophecies about Jesus are removed in the Greek version, not the other way around.
You must be retarded then.

Out of the 300 or so times the OT is quoted in the NT, 250 of those times are from the Septuagint. In about 80 of those lines, the Septuagint is far more conceptually and linguistically in line with the NT than the Masoretic text, which often destroys the meaning and continuity of teaching.

Of your examples, only Zechariah 12:10 and Psalm 2:12 are valid, but those are exceptions to the rule. You're flat our wrong in regards to Hosea 11:1 where both the masoretic and septuagint are the same. Isaiah 9:6 is a different tone with the same meaning and so holds 0 weight to your argument.

>It seems to me like those extolling the Septuagint are often not aware of these basic facts
Seems to me you're not aware of basic scholarly consensus or Isaiah 7:14, Isaiah 53, Psalm 40:6, Psalm 14:3, Wisdom 2, Habakkuk 2:4, Amos 9:12. And there's many, many more.

The Masoretic also leaves out more than a dozen whole books like Tobit, Ecclesiasticus, Maccabees, Esther etc and even Daniel which is a pretty fucking important book in regards to Christ's prophecies.

>This "Hexaplar Septuagint" of Origen in the 3rd century AD is generally the basis for what people now call the Septuagint
And this is just false, there's many sources for the Septuagint not just Origen.
Replies: >>24499313
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 3:17:06 AM No.24499313
>>24498805
Yeah, but I want a physical copy.
>>24499048
Can we have a single inter-denominational debate without name calling?
Also, even if your Eastern Orthodox, the maximum number of books in their Bible (because their is a minimum) is 78, which is exactly and does not exceed a dozen more than the Protestant 66. Furthermore, the books of Esther and Daniel aren’t counted in that number as only portions of them are removed. One possible reason you might believe it’s “over a dozen” is because the KJV Apocrypha has 14 ‘books’ in the table of contents thereof, including ‘The Rest of Esther’ and 3 parts of Daniel, which leaves 10 extra books, totalling 76. That is unless you’re referring to the modern Expanded Apocrypha, which has 4 more entries summed up as 84, but that minus 4 is obviously 80, and 1 is an other portion like that regarding Daniel and Esther (Psalm 151) and another is because of a separation from Baruch (The Epistle of Jeremiah) which is always together in our Catholic Bibles.
Replies: >>24499727
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 7:15:28 AM No.24499727
>>24499313
What a shitty low IQ post. Good job on focusing on the phrase 'over a dozen' and then bumbling around to indeed conclude that it's 'more than a dozen.' Use your 'more than a dozen' braincells to be less fucking stupid next time you post.
Replies: >>24500093
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 12:16:14 PM No.24500093
>>24499727
But it’s not more than a dozen.