>there is nothing
>there is one thing
>there are two things
>there are a few things
>there are many things
>there are infinite things
Which do you most identify with and why?

>>24493241 (OP)

>>24493241 (OP)
Retard here. Not sure I agree with any of these as THE one answer to the question. I think our perspective colors our search for the truth of existence, and in some ways searching for it is like trying to look at the back of your own eyeball. I don't have a concrete answer to the question but I think we should speak of things as being continuous rather than discrete if we are to arrive at such an answer.

>>24493241 (OP)
There are one and many, trinitarian reality

the way begets one
one begets two
two begets three
three begets the myriad things

>>24494130
is that tao

>>24493241 (OP)
One and infinite are the same doofus

>>24493241 (OP)
There is me and there is not me

>>24493241 (OP)
A few and many are the same doofus

Dualism is self-refuting by default. So that leaves you with one thing or many things. Reading on this topic which I like The One and the Many by RJ Rushdoony.

>>24493257
The apparent plurality of things can be accounted for by having them be images or aspects of the One, multiple real entities is completely unnecessary. One existent thing is more parsimonious.

>>24495845
Meant as reply to OP

>>24495684
yup. verse 42

>>24493241 (OP)
Thanks anon for helping me write today.
>>24496315

>>24493241 (OP)
Everything is of one origin thinking itself into existence. Mind as separate substance from existence was always moronic.

>>24493241 (OP)
one is all and all is one

There is at least one thing.

>>24493241 (OP)
There is one and many, but the many set still part of The One, but the many are not The One, so that ultimate oneness belong only to The One, but that there is a sort of oneness between The One and its subsidiary many.

What's the difference between few and many things?