>>24494914 (OP)
The Bible clearly paints Jesus as God.
People who argue that it doesn't are usually arguing that specific books don't paint Jesus as God, that it was a doctrine which developed over time, and the books which more explicitly depict Jesus as God came later. It's a viewpoint held by non-believers, who view the Bible as a disparate collection of books.
However, you're asking if the deity of Christ is "Biblical," which (I assume) means you consider the Bible a singular text. That's the Christian view, which assumes harmony of the Bible because the different books and authors were inspired by the one Holy Spirit.
If doctrines can be Biblical, then yes, the doctrine of the deity of Christ is unambiguously Biblical.
The strongest is when the Apostle Thomas calls Jesus "My Lord and My God" and Jesus blesses him for believing. It's at the end of the Gospel of John. The beginning narrative of the gospel of John says Jesus is the word, and the word "was with God and was God," implying some belief in a singular God with multiple members, it's not explicitly stating the entirety of trinitarianism in so many words, but it does line up more with trinitarian theology than any other mainstream religious doctrine.
Outside of the Gospels, the Epistles frequently state Jesus is God. Philippians 2:5-7, 2 Peter 1:1, Colossians 1:15, Colossians 2:9, etc.
There is certainly no honest Biblical interpretation in which Jesus is a mere man and nothing more. You can't read the Bible and come away with it thinking "this book wants me to believe Jesus is just a prophet."
Many people in New Religious Movements try to square the concept of believing in the Bible but not believing Jesus is God, and it can't be done.
The deity of Christ is definitely Biblical.
>>24494933
>“Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good except God alone."
It's an open ended question. Two ways to read that verse:
1. Jesus is good, and is therefore God
2. Jesus is not God, and is therefore not good
