Anonymous
6/27/2025, 5:44:50 AM No.24499558
what would the great philosophers of the past think of current AI as it is today?
Replies:
Thread 24499558 - /lit/ [Archived: 799 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 5:57:54 AM No.24499586
>>24499558 (OP)
Gay pedantic and retarded. The worst thing about LLMs is the fucking morons who are so trite and uninteresting that they type shit out into it and then copy/paste it onto 4chan for engagement. It’s probably nice for cattlehumans with absolutely fried fucking dopamine receptors though.
Gay pedantic and retarded. The worst thing about LLMs is the fucking morons who are so trite and uninteresting that they type shit out into it and then copy/paste it onto 4chan for engagement. It’s probably nice for cattlehumans with absolutely fried fucking dopamine receptors though.
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 6:03:43 AM No.24499605
I'm glad the chatgpjeet faggot spamming Plato, Christ and recently Aristotle got banned
Replies:
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 6:15:35 AM No.24499631
>>24499630
spam /lit/? I guess you haven't seen
spam /lit/? I guess you haven't seen
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 6:16:26 AM No.24499634
>>24499630
Ostensibly trying to spread some message but in reality was astroturfing to try and turn /lit/ against platonism for some reason. very strange fellow. Perhaps his hindoo gods were insulted by a Christian or Moslem on twitter and he got his feefees hurt.
He had all but admitted a few weeks ago (this spam was prolific) that he wasn’t actually religious and that the spam was a false-flag.
Ostensibly trying to spread some message but in reality was astroturfing to try and turn /lit/ against platonism for some reason. very strange fellow. Perhaps his hindoo gods were insulted by a Christian or Moslem on twitter and he got his feefees hurt.
He had all but admitted a few weeks ago (this spam was prolific) that he wasn’t actually religious and that the spam was a false-flag.
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 11:54:43 AM No.24500069
>>24499558 (OP)
They'd recognise it for the fad that it is.
They'd recognise it for the fad that it is.
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 2:23:11 PM No.24500301
>>24499558 (OP)
Aristotle has a comment in the Politics apropos to it, referring to the self-moving instruments of Daedaelus and tripods of Hephaestus. To the extent that it's for the production of something, it seems fine as any other tool to him, but it can't take the place of action, since human life is action. So to that extent he'd be okay with AI put in charge of working machines, but having it think for you would cross a line, as it would for probably many of the pre-20th century philosophers. I imagine Nietzsche would shrug at the use of it by the rabble, "of course that's what the rabble would do," but having AI "think" on behalf of oneself or accepting AI art as legitimate would be grounds for denying that such a person is any kind of higher type.
>>24499605
He did a Nietzsche thread too earlier this week. It's absolutely baffling.
Aristotle has a comment in the Politics apropos to it, referring to the self-moving instruments of Daedaelus and tripods of Hephaestus. To the extent that it's for the production of something, it seems fine as any other tool to him, but it can't take the place of action, since human life is action. So to that extent he'd be okay with AI put in charge of working machines, but having it think for you would cross a line, as it would for probably many of the pre-20th century philosophers. I imagine Nietzsche would shrug at the use of it by the rabble, "of course that's what the rabble would do," but having AI "think" on behalf of oneself or accepting AI art as legitimate would be grounds for denying that such a person is any kind of higher type.
>>24499605
He did a Nietzsche thread too earlier this week. It's absolutely baffling.
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 2:31:06 PM No.24500315
>>24499558 (OP)
I stayed away from ChatGPT because I considered it gimmicky, but I started using it the last few days, and it's pretty fun. I'm not detecting any problems in its reasoning, and it's entertaining spitballing ideas and getting immediate answers.
I stayed away from ChatGPT because I considered it gimmicky, but I started using it the last few days, and it's pretty fun. I'm not detecting any problems in its reasoning, and it's entertaining spitballing ideas and getting immediate answers.
Anonymous
6/27/2025, 2:45:06 PM No.24500336
AI cannot grasp philosophy in any capacity, as of now. I tried to have a discussion with Chat-GPT on Spengler and it was so incredibly far off the mark that it didn't even know what Spenglerian historiography was.
It dressed him up as a neoliberal German living in a Nazi age.
It dressed him up as a neoliberal German living in a Nazi age.