Anonymous
6/29/2025, 3:56:42 PM No.24506046
Is there any point to reading and writing when it will all just be eventually washed away in the ai generated slop ocean?
Replies:
read this book on a silent hill by norbert szász - /lit/ (#24506046) [Archived: 962 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 4:00:05 PM No.24506050
>>24506046 (OP)
god I love women who put their hair up like that its so sexy.
god I love women who put their hair up like that its so sexy.
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 4:34:31 PM No.24506120
based?
ॐ
!ew4B6gxEuk
6/29/2025, 4:45:48 PM No.24506139
>>24506046 (OP)
AI can't erase the thousands of years of literature that already exists, nor can it be as profound or poignant as anything a human being can get across.
AI can't erase the thousands of years of literature that already exists, nor can it be as profound or poignant as anything a human being can get across.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/29/2025, 4:50:21 PM No.24506147
>>24506046 (OP)
You were born to die and everything you do will be washed away by time
No. There's no ultimate point. Yes, it's still worth doing
You were born to die and everything you do will be washed away by time
No. There's no ultimate point. Yes, it's still worth doing
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 1:38:14 AM No.24507316
>>24506046 (OP)
Anon, why do you read?
Why do you write?
Why do you think an AI can be a substitute for either of those things?
The personal, human element of art isn't an infinitesimally small novelty in the aggregate of art. It's the entire point. AI "art" is hollow by definition. I know that calling it "soulless" is cliche, but it's also true. AI has no thoughts, no experiences, no message it wants to share, no interests of its own. It's sterile.
Why do people insist on keeping live flowers in their homes and gardens when plastic flowers will remain immaculate for a thousand lifespans? Because authenticity is beautiful, and artificial imitations are uncanny.
Anon, why do you read?
Why do you write?
Why do you think an AI can be a substitute for either of those things?
The personal, human element of art isn't an infinitesimally small novelty in the aggregate of art. It's the entire point. AI "art" is hollow by definition. I know that calling it "soulless" is cliche, but it's also true. AI has no thoughts, no experiences, no message it wants to share, no interests of its own. It's sterile.
Why do people insist on keeping live flowers in their homes and gardens when plastic flowers will remain immaculate for a thousand lifespans? Because authenticity is beautiful, and artificial imitations are uncanny.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 12:24:28 PM No.24508239
>>24507316
idk
idk
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:32:25 PM No.24508402
>>24506139
It can bury it in a trillion imitations. In 100 or 200 years I doubt schools will teach or show the classics. They may eventually be forgotten, drowned out even in the training data of the AI models. No one will ask for "the classics" because the concept of "the classics" won't exist. There will be no looking for Wagner or Rimbaud or Nietzche or Shelley or Dante or Virgil or Homer or anything like that because no one will know they exist or care. The last holdouts will be people who refuse to send their children to public schools, and when homeschooling is considered child abuse, that too will end.
It can bury it in a trillion imitations. In 100 or 200 years I doubt schools will teach or show the classics. They may eventually be forgotten, drowned out even in the training data of the AI models. No one will ask for "the classics" because the concept of "the classics" won't exist. There will be no looking for Wagner or Rimbaud or Nietzche or Shelley or Dante or Virgil or Homer or anything like that because no one will know they exist or care. The last holdouts will be people who refuse to send their children to public schools, and when homeschooling is considered child abuse, that too will end.