After reading Deleuze and fully comprehending his work, you arrive at Catholicism.

Reading List:

1. Nietzsche and Philosophy
2. Difference and Repetition
3. The Logic of Sense
4. Anti-Oedipus

>>24513323 (OP)
I have read your post and concluded that you are retarded.

>>24513323 (OP)
How do you get from anti-Oedipus to catholicism?

>>24513327

Deleuze and Whitehead are rather popular within theology departments.

>>24513345
So? Whitehead said that God changes and that God did not create the world. Try telling that to any catholic priest.

>>24513323 (OP)
Catholics have a long intellectual history and even though they have to defend a bunch of outdated nonsense they do a decent job engaging with academia seriously. But now we have a bunch of Nick Fuentes groyper tradcaths that think every philosophy leads to Catholic dogma. Nothing in Deleuze would cause you to convert to Catholicism. At best, some Catholic intellectuals might try to extract some value from his work to fit with their dogma, although I'm not sure what that would be. I went to Catholic school growing up and know a lot of great people who are part of the Church, and I have respect for it as an institution despite my disagreements with the dogma, but online tradcaths are the most disingenuous retards on this side of the internet. The church has denounced Fuentes and other far right Catholics because their entire political ideology goes against the spirit and teachings of the Church. I sound a little schizo namedropping Fuentes but his young fans shit up this board constantly.

>>24513323 (OP)
What passages in those works convinced you of Catholicism?

>>24513323 (OP)

This has to be an exceptionally meta troll

>>24513390
>exceptionally meta

No. It's just random.

>>24513323 (OP)
the ccc

>>24513374
Who are you trying to convince?

>>24513374
>a bunch of Nick Fuentes groyper tradcaths that think every philosophy leads to Catholic dogma
Never heard of such thing.
>The church has denounced Fuentes
No, it hasn't.
> I sound a little schizo namedropping Fuentes but his young fans shit up this board constantly.
Why? Because they call out the jewish mafia?

>>24514922
>>24514930

>>24513323 (OP)
You neglected the faciality plateau? Its maybe the most Christian thing they wrote. But I still don't know how you arrived at the notion hes a cryptocatholic. He is a Spinozist, and I'm pretty sure thats not part of the church.

>>24515026
Is that an actual quote from the Abecedaire? I know the one about cheese is, but I'm curious about the context for this one.

>>24515151
>You neglected the faciality plateau?
I haven't read any D&G in ages, but to me that was the one of the weirdest parts from ATP, and that's saying something. I didn't really understand what they were getting at. Maybe it has something to do with our tendency to see faces everywhere? Apparently, children recognize faces from a very early age and it's probably instrumental to our survival.

>>24513336
Because he didn't read A Thousand Plateaus. If he read it he would become a based atheist tranny.
The "Deleuze to Catholicism" pipeline only works if you don't go full rabbit hole into Deleuze and stop right before it becomes really good.