How many Lilliputian women would it have taken to give Gulliver a blowjob?

>>24513451 (OP)
One, duh

>>24513451 (OP)
You could probably figure it out through inferences and comparisons.
The key point would be how Gulliver's penis does come up as a plot point in the Lilliputian section of the book when there is a fire and he puts it out by pissing on it.
Now when firefighting the firefighters typically use a hose which shoots a stream of water reaching a few inches to a foot in width depending on the pressure. Now obviously he is not pissing with the pressure force of a firehose so it would fair on the wider end lets say 1 Lilliputian foot in width.
Lilliputians are described as 1/12 the size of Gulliver so the "firehose stream" of 1 Lilliputian foot makes Gulliver's piss stream roughly 1 human inch at the time. The typical urination stream width of a human male is 0.2 inches meaning Gulliver was pissing a stream 5 times the normal width. Furthermore the average urethra size 0.6 inches and as we know larger holes produce wider streams lining up with a stream 5 times wider. Using the Freeman's ratio hose to stream ratio which isn't a 1 to 1 increase we conclude Gulliver has a urethra equivalently 3 times bigger at 1.8 inch diameter urethra. The urethra taking up about 10% of the penis shaft girth means that Gulliver's penis has a girth of almost 18 inches.
The ratio of a penis girth to length is not exact but when erect as he would be when getting his dick sucked it is about 1:1.12. So Gulliver is working with maybe a 20 incher. The surface area using the formula for an elongated dome gives 1,100 square inches.
As for the mouths of the women. They can't fit it into the mouth so instead of depth of mouth/throat we will have to use lip/open mouth area covering the dick. Normal human lips cover 33 square inches which would mean his dick could have 33 human women fit their mouths on it.
Recalling that Lilliputians are 1/12 the size of a human 396 Lilliputian women would be needed to give Gulliver a blowjob.

>>24513891
Anon, scholar extraordinaire.

>>24513891

>>24513891
Wrong. Guilliver has an affair the wife of Flimnap, Lilliput's treasurer so it must be possible by one Lilliputian.

Besides, what's the difference then between one woman using her lips and moving around vs 396 staying still?

Is it even a BJ if none of them have him in their whole mouth and only have their lips on it? Would you accept a BJ that is only kissing?

>>24513993
The problem is that you suffer under Platonic delusions of the proto-ideal form of the blowjob; whereas genuine definitions are group categorisations. A stool is still a sort of chair, albeit an atypical example. So yes, 396 tonguing Lillisluts would absolutely qualify as a blowjob.

>>24514082
>>24513891
In an up and down motion there would be more stimulation and so imagine if you will a ring that traverses up and down, perhaps 1/6th of the aforementioned quantity is then necessary, landing at 66. They could either be positioned statically at say a constructed wooden deck where Gulliver would be responsible for a horizontal motion. The friction generated would perhaps need to be lowered with an oil. Or they would have to be in 3 layers of 22, surrounding, or 6 layers of 11, themselves responsible for a vertical motion. With six layers this is difficult unless assisted by a constructed lever, then eleven levers or cranes. With three layers of 22, this is slow but almost manageable with human strength.

>>24513891
You are assuming that a blowjob only works with a 1:1 ratio of mouth to dick. This is normally used because humans have one set of lips and 1 dick but couldn't a person with only one lip and half a tongue still give a blowjob, meaning the number can be halved? What is the minimum ratio?

>>24513891
Witnessed

>>24513891
Jonathan Swift would probably be happy that his book resulted in this