Is it ignorant of me to disregard any philosopher that never had kids or even a wife?
Because if you fail the very basics of human life then what good are your supposed theories and essays?

>>24515594 (OP)
kant just said everything thomas reid said but in the most retarded and autistic way possible anyway. also that picture is jacobi

>>24515594 (OP)
>Because if you fail the very basics of human life then what good are your supposed theories and essays?

Don't take any writer seriously especially kant

being a well-adjusted member of society is not among the requirements to be a great writer. I think it even negatively correlates.

isn't it the case that most philosophers do not have children?

It's not just ignorant, it's full blown retarded. But the closest you've come to philosophy is laughing at virgin vs chad memes, retarded hylic.

Geniuses don't have children.

>>24515696
>>24515982
>I can't breed

>>24515982
Hegel, Saint Augustine, Aristotle...

>>24516091
>Hegel

>>24515623
>>24515696
>>24515982
>“Are you a man? Then play your part as a man. Is it your role to marry, to raise children, to take part in public life? Then do so.” - Epictetus
>“What was Socrates like? He married, raised children, served in the army, and joined in public affairs... All this he endured with dignity, and yet he never ceased to study philosophy.” - Epictetus

No wonder philosincels like Nietszche or Schopenhauer and their deranged followers hated stoics so much.
Having a fit body, having children and being a useful member of society should be a standard requirement for being taken serious.

>>24516789
Post family