>>24516709What you gotta understand about Fisher is that he was a modern culture researcher who stood at the "peak of development" of Britain's culture, was raised to expect things to become better and more advanced, did not see it happening, and turned to people like Lacan and Jameson for answers. There's surprisingly little "political" in his major works as in "how can we end this". He sees a disease, describes its symptoms, but kills himself before he can envision a cure. There are a lot of comparisons to both modern movies and obscure 1980s British movie essays 2.5 people have heard of because that's the field he tries to deduce. It's "pop culture researchers Fisher and Reynolds" and not "left wing thinkers Fisher and, IDK, Varoufakis?"when people are describing stuff like hauntology for a reason. You read him and move on to more advanced stuff if you're in for ideology.
If you're already familiar with things like Marx's theory of alienation, you're not going to find incredible new insights here. You can find some new names and ideas you haven't heard of, but you gotta read the sources (like Jameson or, lmao, Negarestani) for his arguments to make more sense. You largely read Fisher for literary analysis and vivid descriptions of Britain's cultural decline. Though he didn't really describe what hauntology exactly is even in his "What is Hauntology?" essay, I think he did a great job adapting that concept as a way of analysing things by introducing more psychological things into it. His takes on music are up to debate (there was this whole debate on whether there is actually absolutely modern music and should it therefore be considered anti-hauntological and there are some interesting things about it), but he doesn't miss with books.
Ghosts of My Life is a great collection of posts that sometimes feels like chewing on glass (early Fisher always takes the least common words in the dictionary), but there are some very interesting interviews with guys like The Caretaker on memory, depression (his essay on Joy Division is both spectacularly stupid and very very good) angelic beings hiding in plain sight and making popular rave music while never actually attending a rave. It's also British to an almost comical degree: the most un-British people described there are Kanye West and Drake.
The Weird and the Eerie was Fisher's most modern (and non-political) book, so it's both easy to read and concentrated enough with what it's dissecting. It has some very interesting works and explorations: i particularly liked the concepts lifted from Cyclonopedia where you have a room that's making people act like a CD player playing back the traumatic experiences that occured there and also his analysis of the "weird" of Lovecraft. It's just a great work all things considered if you're into literary analysis and it's also pretty short so he doesn't take a lot of time driving home the points it wants to make.