>>24518476 (OP)The Joyce influence is primarily that Gass wanted to put in the time to write one big book where he labored over every single word and every single nuance until it was perfect no matter how long it took and really this aspect of the novel is influenced by all those authors who did that and who influenced Gass. Overall it is very much a Gass novel and we see far more of him than any of his influences. One of my favorite novels. After you finish it give the audiobook a listen, Gass himself reads it, it is quite good.
>>24518519Sort of? Omensetter's Luck is not the best intro to Gass since he was still figuring out who he was as a writer with it. The Tunnel is actually the most approachable when it comes understanding who Gass was as a writer since the length offers far repetitions; The Tunnel is life rendered as a series of tunnels both figurative and literal, and through the duration of the novel we explore hundreds of tunnels and we understand Kohler through his fondness of tunnels. This is how Gass works as a writer, you have a central image/idea which he uses to explore what is happening in the work and that image/idea is treated like character, it evolves and grows instead of just being stated or developed. Omensetter's Luck and The Pedersen Kid are outliers in Gass' work, he is figuring out his style with them, he sort of has things figured out but is still too influenced by his ideals of literature and the dogma those ideals imposed on him. Both are great but only offer a glimpse into who he was as a writer.
>>24522352On Being Blue is a better short sample, or any of his novellas. His style can be difficult to get in short story form, which is part of why so many dislike all but The Pedersen Kid which is almost a traditional short story. I did not really get any of his short stories until I read The Tunnel and I expect the only people who really get them without the help of his later works are those who are really into short stories and the freedom they provide the author.