>>24520685 But hero of our time feels different, even compared to other superfluous man literature. The other books I've read lack that distinct self-awareness Pechorin has, and just fall into cheap irony/critique, it seems similar but that pathos is fundamentally missing.
>>24520763 The point is not to embrace the superflous man nor to critique him, irony can say nothing meaningful. Both approaches fall completely flat. Rather you need to linger with him, be kindred in a real way. That's what hero of our time (maybe even despite Lermontov himself) achieves which the rest of the genre lacks.