Anonymous
7/5/2025, 12:34:31 AM No.24521797
>As long as the phrase is literally correct, it can be used metaphorically
TLP has the magic touch when it comes to writing holy shit
TLP has the magic touch when it comes to writing holy shit
Thread 24521797 - /lit/ [Archived: 671 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/5/2025, 12:54:04 AM No.24521841
>magic touch
what are you talking about? this reads horribly. clearly some guy who read one nietzsche book and started huffing his own farts. also, he doesn't seem to understand porn. there is no "porn ideal," the only "porn ideal" is novelty, even if you have a "porn ideal" for a day you will quickly get tired of it, unless you barely ever watch porn.
what are you talking about? this reads horribly. clearly some guy who read one nietzsche book and started huffing his own farts. also, he doesn't seem to understand porn. there is no "porn ideal," the only "porn ideal" is novelty, even if you have a "porn ideal" for a day you will quickly get tired of it, unless you barely ever watch porn.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/5/2025, 2:37:46 AM No.24522037
Every thread I ask what the purpose of the shitty erotica was, and every thread /lit/ fails to answer
Replies:
Anonymous
7/5/2025, 3:03:38 AM No.24522078
>>24522037
It's to prime the reader for the rest of the book. Does a reader get off on a ditzy woman cucking her husband, or does a reader get indignant, or does the reader even get bored because "eh, it's not hot enough, but if it went like THIS..." The rest of the book is digging into the minds of porn obsessed men.
There's also a bit of a call back in the story to an idea he discusses in Hipsters On Foodstamps part 3:
>Or, if I can be permitted a judicious use of psychoanalytic jargon: it's the rationalization that allows you to blow a guy you can't stand, "I hate him but I'm going to make him cum so hard he'll just want more of me, which will be his punishment." Let that analogy sink in for a moment. From his perspective, not only did he still get blown, he liked it even more. NB: in this analogy, the guy is capitalism and you're not.
And
>You gave the system you don't like a spectacular blowjob, and then try to punish it by making it want you more. From the system's perspective, not only did it still get blown, it liked it even more. In this analogy, the system is the system and you're not.
This is the justification the woman in the story uses for fucking her husband's rival.
It's to prime the reader for the rest of the book. Does a reader get off on a ditzy woman cucking her husband, or does a reader get indignant, or does the reader even get bored because "eh, it's not hot enough, but if it went like THIS..." The rest of the book is digging into the minds of porn obsessed men.
There's also a bit of a call back in the story to an idea he discusses in Hipsters On Foodstamps part 3:
>Or, if I can be permitted a judicious use of psychoanalytic jargon: it's the rationalization that allows you to blow a guy you can't stand, "I hate him but I'm going to make him cum so hard he'll just want more of me, which will be his punishment." Let that analogy sink in for a moment. From his perspective, not only did he still get blown, he liked it even more. NB: in this analogy, the guy is capitalism and you're not.
And
>You gave the system you don't like a spectacular blowjob, and then try to punish it by making it want you more. From the system's perspective, not only did it still get blown, it liked it even more. In this analogy, the system is the system and you're not.
This is the justification the woman in the story uses for fucking her husband's rival.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/5/2025, 3:24:14 AM No.24522109
>>24522078
this is hideously retarded and this man should not have access to a keyboard or a pen
this is hideously retarded and this man should not have access to a keyboard or a pen
Anonymous
7/5/2025, 4:13:37 AM No.24522184
>this reads horribly
Wrong
>no "porn ideal"
He's not defining what "Porn Ideal"™ means (whatever that means to You is another question)
But just what "what common theme could be established by checking your porn usage history"
>"b-but I wanted different thing at times in life, its not constant""
Whatever was the common type, when that "then" was "now" and someone asks you "Whats your type?"
Wrong
>no "porn ideal"
He's not defining what "Porn Ideal"™ means (whatever that means to You is another question)
But just what "what common theme could be established by checking your porn usage history"
>"b-but I wanted different thing at times in life, its not constant""
Whatever was the common type, when that "then" was "now" and someone asks you "Whats your type?"
Replies:
Anonymous
7/5/2025, 4:16:59 AM No.24522189