>>24522071A pedophile has eyes.
A pedophile has hands, guts, height, eyes, feelings and loves.
Pedos eat food. Pedos can be stabbed. Pedos get AIDS.
Pedos take pills. Pedos have heaters and AC. Pedos live in Winter and Summer just like decent people.
If you stab a Pedo he gushes blood.
If you tickle a Pedo you probably need to be arrested.
If you poison a Pedo he dies.
If you harm a Pedo he'll come after you.
If Pedos are like decent human beings, shouldn't Pedos be allowed to come after you?
If a Pedo attacks a decent person, the decent person will bash the pedo.
If a decent person attacks a pedo, the pedo will rape their kids.
All the bashing you've done to me, I'm going to rape your kids.
* * *
It isn't Philo-semitic. You're not reading it in the sense that a Shakespearean audience would read it. Shylock's argument is meant to delight the lawyers in the room while still being objectionably non-Christian. Shakespeare is playing with Hubris here, but the Hubris is being Jewish when Christ is King. Shylock at his most Shylock is still a stage villain. And the audience is prompted to laugh. "Yes of course you've got arms, YOU FUCKEN JEW CUNT." "Jewishness" is an ontological category: there is no escape from it by an appeal to common humanity because Jewishness is not commonly human: it is not christian; for the audience. Now Shakespeare's text might be making a universal humanist argument, but it has to make it with an audience that treats Jews as not human. And the lawyers in the audience will enjoy it all the more so because a few words turns Shylock from an inhuman monster into a decent human being: I love you Jesus Christ.
* * *
Fuck me the undergraduates are dumb this year.