>>24526054 (OP)Your word is a bit inflammatory but to be charitable, there is an aspect of reading as a hobby which is culturally performative. Reading is commonly used to signify someone is intelligent and it's also seen as 'high culture'. A lot of people feel they need to read more not because they want the knowledge that reading provides (or if they do, then only as a secondary goal) but because they feel a well-rounded and socially valuable person is one who reads. Part of the frustration with people who mostly read fantasy comes from this. From one perspective, it feels like a cheat code where they can acquire all the cultural prestige of reading without reading anything that has historically been given as a justification for that prestige, like prominent works of literature or philosophy.
Is it Eurocentric? Well, kind of? In the sense that if you're reading to acquire cultural capital then you are probably more likely to read classics which do tend to be European -- at least, the classics in Western countries. Is it offensively Eurocentric? I would say no. Unless, for example, you're an Asian person in an Asian country using literature as a way to kind of coopt European culture, which does happen surprisingly often.