pro tip: you can basically read >100 books per day by asking chatgpt to summarize them for you.

My 19 year old Filipino fucktoy secretary does this for me. She reads it to me while I lounge in the bath. She pokes her little tongue between my toes and brings me tumeric and ginger tea. These are not the same.

pro tip: you can basically run >1000 miles per day by driving a car.

>>24526273 (OP)
interdasting

>>24526273 (OP)
They already have this, it's called the back of the book.

Not true. I was reading Dangerous Liaisons and asked GPT to tell me who the fuck Julie was and it absolutely couldn't. It thought Julie was Cecile, that Valmont was Merteuil and that the hunter was Valmont.
Completely useless and I had to look up the pdf to see where Julie was first introduced

Pro tip: ignore anyone who prefaces what they say with "pro tip."

>>24526273 (OP)
you could also simply read the wiki page which contains better information anyway

Did you just discover that summaries exist

>>24526273 (OP)
Indeed. AI has shown literature for what it is, a house of cards. Too much time is spent reading books, when you can get the gist quickly and easily, without having to spend days reading. In the future there will be no books, no libraries, only chat gpt.

>>24526273 (OP)
chatgpt doesn't work as well as gemini i find

it gets false information

I haven’t used, tried, played with, etc ai a single time I have no clue how or where even. I’m sure I could google it but I haven’t even done that

>>24528300
duck.ai
try this

it's the ai for duckduckgo. i think it uses chatgpt

>>24528302
you can also change from chatgpt to claude if you find that chatgpt gives you shit answers

>>24528304

>>24528361

>>24526348
In a computer simulator

>>24526273 (OP)
>protip you can do a thing by not doing it
Ahuh.

>>24526273 (OP)
Thankfully I'm not Indian so I am capable of reading and appreciating literature.