Thread 24530685 - /lit/ [Archived: 501 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/8/2025, 4:18:38 AM No.24530685
snape-and-voldemort-at-the-end
snape-and-voldemort-at-the-end
md5: 84fed07cc866e6855486485b3f6d0f33🔍
Why wouldn't Voldemort kill Snape as soon as he got all the information from him after he didn't return when he called. He'd been working with the enemy for a decade. All the other death eaters have rules except him
Replies: >>24530696 >>24530699 >>24530776 >>24530943 >>24531010
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 4:22:28 AM No.24530694
Too useful a mole/tool. Even after Dumbledore was dead, having Your Guy running Hogwarts was extremely useful and nice. Voldemort wrung every last bit of use he could out of Snape, I can't really blame him.
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 4:23:12 AM No.24530696
>>24530685 (OP)
It wouldn't dawn on JK that this would be a problem
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 4:25:09 AM No.24530699
>>24530685 (OP)
HP sucks
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 5:02:40 AM No.24530776
>>24530685 (OP)
>"Do you really think that the Dark Lord has not asked me each and every one of those questions? And do you really think that, had I not been able to give satisfactory answers, I would be sitting here talking to you?"
— Snape, to Bellatrix Lestrange
Replies: >>24530943
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 6:52:23 AM No.24530943
>>24530776
did you read the book? he was mostly bluffing

>>24530685 (OP)
op the answer is that this series is so full of plot holes that if you were to cover them all up you would end up with a textbook about bandaids
Replies: >>24531570
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 7:51:25 AM No.24531010
>>24530685 (OP)
>why didnt this fucking retard who couldnt kill a defenseless baby kill this other character?
I dont know. Maybe because he's incompetent.
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 3:32:06 PM No.24531570
>>24530943
>did you read the book? he was mostly bluffing
Are you low IQ? No shit, there's a whole chapter devoted to this. I posted Snapes own explanation why