Are John Lennon's books worth reading?

>>24531156 (OP)
I doubt it. he's a raging commie degenerate with a very high opinion of himself who was carried by his more talented band mates. If Jon Lennon didn't get shot to death, society would have moved on from his retardation by now.

>>24531156 (OP)
>>24531213
I don't know about that, seeming everyone still thinks the Beatles are great (I can't stand them)

I'd read it for a laugh, I mean look at that fag.

It released in 1964 when he was one of the four Justin Biebers of the time. Reading something by him after Strawberry Fields can be excusable but unless you're a teenage woman you shouldn't even be considering doing so

>>24531213
>he's a raging commie degenerate
was he, though?

>>24531255
tired old bait

>>24531284
>everything I don't like is bait

>>24531288
calling them "four Justin Biebers" is the epitome of a /mu/ tier bait

>>24531311
Yet it's true.

>>24531312
Nah. False equivalence but it's a common b8 among /mu/ trolls.

>>24531313
Most people would agree which is why you think it's such a prevalent bait

>>24531316
I don't care about hypothetical woulds and mosts. I know they weren't "four Justin Biebers".

>>24531322
They definitely were in 1964. Most Beatles fans nowadays never listened to a pre-Rubber Soul album of theirs

>>24531327
See: >>24531322

>>24531334
>LA LA LA LA LA LA LA
>CAN'T HEAR YOU
I'm not even gonna ask you to attempt to defend their pre-Rubber Soul music because I really don't care about any of this

>>24531342
You know every Beatles fan in the world for some reason and they all told you they have never ever listened to pre-rubber soul music. Right. What's the point of arguing with a person who: a) makes up imaginary "mosts" based solely on vibes, and b) thinks the Beatles, one of the most influential bands of all time, is somehow the 60s equivalent of a mediocre pop singer-dancer from 2010s? do you even read what you write? lol come on now

>>24531353
Okay it seems like you REALLY care about this, so tell me: in what ways exactly were pre-Rubber Soul Beatles influential? Apart from spawning hundreds of heart-throbbing bands nobody remembers or bands who tried the best they could to be the "anti-Beatles". Why does nobody talk about these albums?

Don't make me tap the sign

>>24531251
>everyone still thinks the Beatles are great

Yes, because Paul McCartney is a great songwriter and George Harrison was a phenomenal guitarist.