>Thus there is here supplied, I think, a first-rate test of the value of any philosophy which is offered us: Does it end in conclusions which, when they are referred back to ordinary life-experiences and their predicaments, render them more significant, more luminous to us, and make our dealings with them more fruitful? Or does it terminate in rendering the things of ordinary experience more opaque than they were before, and in depriving them of having in "reality" even the significance they had previously seemed to have? Does it yield the enrichment and increase of power of ordinary things which the results of physical science afford when applied in every-day affairs? Or does it become a mystery that these ordinary things should bewhat they are; and are philosophic concepts left to dwell in separation in some technical realm of their own?
99% of philosophy BTFOd.

>>24532998 (OP)
Americanized Machiavellianism

Well said. Knowledge that is not useful to me and does not make me happy ought to be discarded and forgotten.

No

>>24532998 (OP)
bump

>>24532998 (OP)
What is he saying?