What writer suffers from the "smell of the lamp"?

IJ

>>24537700 (OP)
there's a write answer here, which I will give on reply 12

smell of the &amp?

>>24537837
Work that is too polished or had too much tome spent on it. OP’s pic is misleading

>>24537840
>too polished
How is that a bad thing?

>>24537840
>too polished
How is that a bad thing? Do you want something half-assed that starts off good only to taper out into mediocrity because the author couldn't be bothered?

>>24537832
>write answer
>write
Something tells me you don't really know it

>>24537992
Because prose that smells of the lamp doesn't sound natural.

>>24538072
I rather try-hard than can't-be-bothered.

>>24538072
>>24537840
>>24537700 (OP)
Shut the fuck up retarded faggot. Go read harry potter

>>24537992
Over polished leads to soulless slop

>>24537832
Well?

>>24537700 (OP)
>>24537832
I'm true to my word. The real answer is all goosebumps novels after the panic park arc

Smell of the ass

everything is overwrought before it drips out of me, so call me aladdin, nigga.

>>24537700 (OP)
stench of the goon

>>24540504
>Literally named Allah Deen (SWT, pbuh)

was he the second coming of Christ, semitebros?

>>24537837
"the smell of the &amp" would mean something that lacks polish to such an extent that it is absurd that the writer didn't show more care

i.e: Husky Mutt Puppy
a story so good, yet so fraught with errors, that a gradeschooler could polish up many of the mistakes and turn in a less erroneous