Anonymous
7/10/2025, 8:35:22 PM No.24537809
Was Heidegger right?
Replies:
Thoughts? - /lit/ (#24537809) [Archived: 413 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 8:36:56 PM No.24537812
Replies:
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 8:42:47 PM No.24537829
>>24537817
homosexual piece of shit why didn't you use the thirty letter word german has for this scenario
homosexual piece of shit why didn't you use the thirty letter word german has for this scenario
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 10:34:28 PM No.24538137
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 11:07:06 PM No.24538218
Which work is this appearing in?
Can't say I've encountered it yet.
Can't say I've encountered it yet.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 11:12:27 PM No.24538230
>>24537809 (OP)
I thought this had to do with enframement (technology). And we are on the path to midnight.
I thought this had to do with enframement (technology). And we are on the path to midnight.
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 11:17:05 PM No.24538239
>>24538218
This sounds like he read Heidegger on Georg Trakl and got confused.
This sounds like he read Heidegger on Georg Trakl and got confused.
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 12:32:44 AM No.24538447
>>24537809 (OP)
I accept your concession. No need to bury all your metaphysical hypotheses in irrational thought. If you work out the Soto versions of Hegel and Heidegger then you run into Dogen's dilemma. At surface level Heidegger appears to be more aligned, but the direct meditative approach won't work with Heidegger unless you accept some rationality, so you're back to Nietzsche/Descartes or Hegel on the western side. The Soto school won't admit to using Hegel's methods but if any sort of initiation occurs then it's also hard for them to deny this. There technically isn't a Mahayana school that is a 1 for 1 on Hegel that I've encountered, but there are some that are remarkably similar, or at the very least can conclude on an agreement.
The only other option is total darkness. To Hegel that is another batch of empty pages placeholding a temporary peace. Your agreement wasn't necessary.
Hope you enjoyed Zengel.
I accept your concession. No need to bury all your metaphysical hypotheses in irrational thought. If you work out the Soto versions of Hegel and Heidegger then you run into Dogen's dilemma. At surface level Heidegger appears to be more aligned, but the direct meditative approach won't work with Heidegger unless you accept some rationality, so you're back to Nietzsche/Descartes or Hegel on the western side. The Soto school won't admit to using Hegel's methods but if any sort of initiation occurs then it's also hard for them to deny this. There technically isn't a Mahayana school that is a 1 for 1 on Hegel that I've encountered, but there are some that are remarkably similar, or at the very least can conclude on an agreement.
The only other option is total darkness. To Hegel that is another batch of empty pages placeholding a temporary peace. Your agreement wasn't necessary.
Hope you enjoyed Zengel.
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 6:45:49 AM No.24539516
>>24537812
France pls
France pls
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 6:48:49 AM No.24539525
was he talking about a final move of human consciousness into a digital medium
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 9:03:44 AM No.24539739
>>24539711
don't you mean schnauzehaltenangelsachsenschimpfwort >.<
don't you mean schnauzehaltenangelsachsenschimpfwort >.<
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 9:04:45 AM No.24539744
>>24537809 (OP)
>Was Heidegger right?
The point of Heidegger is that "right" can't exist, only being exists. Go chop wood. Go draw water. Go eat Hannah Arendt's tight young cunt.
>Was Heidegger right?
The point of Heidegger is that "right" can't exist, only being exists. Go chop wood. Go draw water. Go eat Hannah Arendt's tight young cunt.
Anonymous
7/11/2025, 9:14:43 AM No.24539762
>>24537809 (OP)
This sounds like something I'm reading right now in Edith Stein. Bot she and Heidegger were Husserl's pupils, after all.
This sounds like something I'm reading right now in Edith Stein. Bot she and Heidegger were Husserl's pupils, after all.