I realized this a while ago. I've never had any original interesting opinions. Most of the time I just believe what other people around me believe or want me to believe.

Me too

>>24538388 (OP)
>>24538411
That's because you're a pair of fags

>>24538421
is it actually because I'm a tranny?

>>24538428
Begone!

>>24538388 (OP)
strive less to have original thoughts and more to have organized thoughts IMO

>>24538388 (OP)
You know..I was going to be snarky but even thats not 'original' (I was going to say your question isnt even original) so..
Hi

>>24538388 (OP)
>I have never had an original thought in my life
Is this what other people want you to believe?

>>24538388 (OP)
>>24538411
what is an original thought anyway ??
something no one has thought of before??? that is a very unlikely thing for most people to do.

What if you worked at an office and one day while talking to your boss you just crossed your eyes very briefly? He'd probably ask you why did you just cross your eyes, but you'd start gaslighting him by saying you didn't. Then you'd get your coworkers in on the gaslighting and get them to cross their eyes briefly while talking with your boss and then denying it

>>24538388 (OP)
It's not about the individual thoughts themselves, it's about how you assemble them. Consider the art of plunderphonics, for example.

>>24538388 (OP)
If it happens it happens.

>>24538501
you might have just changed my life

>>24538388 (OP)
there are plenty of low key demoralisation threads like this. why

>>24539147
low key ong fr fr

>>24539147
>>24539150
high key I be having og thoughts like daily. OP is kinda sus ngl.

>>24539150
>>24539152
the shill is panicking. This is handmade.

>>24538388 (OP)
just take a fairly complex thought and write it down and then roll some dice and replace a random word in that thought with a random word from the dictionary and then thats a new thought

>>24538388 (OP)
Nothing is new in the universe. Just things undiscovered by its observers.
Thoughts are like permutations of patterns all going down paths, often arriving at similar conclusions.

>>24539155
on my momma tho

I’m a high-IQ and have many thoughts most people would consider to be novel. Let me assure you that it’s not as fun as you may believe it is. Most people don’t have the intelligence level to understand them, and they’re always unintuitive so most people don’t even bother trying to understand. It’s the usual complaint of being a high-IQ, you’re surrounded by farm animals, barely sentient human beings.

For example, here’s one: the leadership of Western governments have no power. If I try to explain in detail why that is midwits will just lose interest because it doesn’t engage their belief systems and social reward mechanics. That’s what it’s like to have “original thoughts”. Here’s another more esoteric one: Maybe pataphysics is real.

>>24539195
>leadership of Western governments have no power.
I wouldn't say no power. they obviously have some but you're correct. most of the power in the west is concentrated outside the governments. not sure where but the governments are obviously subordinate to something else.

>>24538388 (OP)
I wager that if you practised automatic writing for 30 minutes something original would come out. While perhaps your so-called conscious mind cannot make a novel combination of existing elements, your subconscious can, and perhaps even excels at it. Despite the nature of your realisation it is an interesting thought in of itself.

>>24539195
I feel very understood in this moment. Thank you.

>>24539226
I think what he means is that the system itself has gained enough momentum for the pull of the reins to have reversed so to speak. But I could be wrong.

>>24538388 (OP)
Its okay fren. Hylics with no generative divine spark don't realize they're hylics.
Like this retard >>24539195
You're probably just being intellectually cautious because you're young and lack confidence.

>“If we examine the mental furniture of the average man,” says William Trotter, the author of a comprehensive study of the social psychology of the individual,4 “we shall find it made up of a vast number of judgments of a very precise kind upon subjects of very great variety, complexity, and difficulty. He will have fairly settled views upon the origin and nature of the universe, and upon what he will probably call its meaning; he will have conclusions as to what is to happen to him at death and after, as to what is and what should be the basis of conduct. He will know how the country should be governed, and why it is going to the dogs, why this piece of legislation is good and that bad. He will have strong views upon military and naval strategy, the principles of taxation, the use of alcohol and vaccination, the treatment of influenza, the prevention of hydrophobia, upon municipal trading, the teaching of Greek, upon what is permissible in art, satisfactory in literature, and hopeful in science.

>Most of the time I just believe what other people around me believe or want me to believe.


>“The bulk of such opinions must necessarily64 be without rational basis, since many of them are concerned with problems admitted by the expert to be still unsolved, while as to the rest it is clear that the training and experience of no average man can qualify him to have any opinion upon them at all

>The rational method adequately used would have told him that on the great majority of these questions there could be for him but one attitude—that of suspended judgment.” (Bernays)

>>24538388 (OP)
You sure? Lots of original thoughts are considered schizo ravings.

>>24539642
so you be sayin that my peer reviewed articles aint shit tho fr fr ? so.. i be retard fr fr

>>24538388 (OP)
learn logic

>>24539642
You’re a midwit. Which is fine, most Westerners are, but you’re not equipped to discuss this with a high-IQ.

>>24539680
Let me guess: your IQ is so high as to render you incapable of any friendship, employment, or any measure of outward joy. In fact, other than the expression you hope is erudite you wear upon your red-eyed face, you are indistinguishable from any peasant from any horde.

I have

>>24539642
The idea of hylics is basically
>anyone who disagrees with my philosophy is obviously an npc so I don't have to engage with any arguments or consider why they may have a different opinion
Basically a way to keep cult members in control, hence its origin in the gnostics. The rest of the categorization fully encapsulates this with psychics being the cult members and pneumatics being the cult leaders.

>>24539680
>guys I'm like super duper smart and you people are actually like super duper dumb and stuff.
anon instead of glazing your balls on an anonymous board, why don't you say something that will challenge our minds.
that way we might actually believe you.